English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

at times central govt officers vested with local purchase powers are compelled to buy items at higher than the MRP. The items are purchased against lowest of at least three quatations. Most of times the lowest quoted rate is higher than the MRP. It is neither mandatory nor insisted to mention Brand as well as MRP. The auditors in this country of ours are either too busy or ill intended. Not even 1/6 worth of item against expenditure to the exchequer is recd actually. can there be a solution.

2007-07-12 01:20:35 · 10 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government Other - Politics & Government

10 answers

It should not be difficult to pass a law or regulation saying government offices can not pay for an item, a price higher than the MRP.

2007-07-18 08:02:18 · answer #1 · answered by johnfarber2000 6 · 0 0

The MRP display is as new as most of our modernised and insisted on statutory warnings where as the formalities to be observed are as old as the British rule.We are willing to pay First Class T A but we are stringy in the case of remuneration-the then British style.Are we to blame auditors only or all of us who do not speak loudly for a timely revision of these formalities?If there is this statutory display of MRP then why should there be three quotations?How is this MRP fixed?

2007-07-14 21:14:55 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

No. The financial proprietary demands that the lowest quote is to be accepted and at least 3 quotes are required to be obtained, judged and then the item should be purchased. However, local taxes extra have to be paid.

2007-07-17 23:02:24 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

Government servants will purchase anything in India for lesser price for their personal use. But for the official purpose they get the quotations from atleast three parties and choose the best rate according their commission rate. That is INDIA or Bharath Yours VRVRAO

2007-07-15 00:40:20 · answer #4 · answered by Raghavendra R 5 · 0 0

No. They should adhere to the printed price. What the Government officers actually do is to get the price inflated and get it printed. This happens on bulk purchases. Benefit goes to the pocket of such Officers. Suppliers help them to do such mischief because they are able to sell their goods without effort.

2007-07-13 18:21:15 · answer #5 · answered by hanvis 4 · 1 0

who gives u all this stupid infomation???????? funny, illogical question. no one is going to buy at a price higher than the MRP printed, and that too through a tender. get your facts right first

2007-07-12 01:27:54 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0 1

noticed you left out the "S" in MSRP
Retailers are not bound by law to follow the manufacturers "suggestion"
Customers, government or otherwise, must pay the retailers price or go elsewhere.

2007-07-12 01:31:37 · answer #7 · answered by gcbtrading 7 · 0 0

It depends upon the purchase procedure,

2007-07-13 03:51:28 · answer #8 · answered by Rana 7 · 0 0

Lol Honey ugly or not you're still my HERO???xxxx

2016-04-01 10:46:58 · answer #9 · answered by Kellie 4 · 0 0

Like a $600 toilet seat??? I think they do!!!!

2007-07-19 22:23:34 · answer #10 · answered by motorheadJJ 2 · 1 0

fedest.com, questions and answers