why don't billionaires have 20+ kids?

Question

they can afford the cost of raising multiple children. plus hire nannies and whatnot.

no need to worry about the details of transporting so many kids, hire another chauffer!

it would stroke their ego immensely. prove their vitality.

exclusitivity

someone else can always buy a bigger yacht or a larger mcmansion.

not many people can join the "raising 20+ kids" club.

passing on their genes. why create a legacy when you only have three kids to leave it to? have 20+ kids and lord over a dynasty

Answer 1

Obviously, they CAN'T raise 20 or more children. They CAN afford to pay other people to raise their children. Apparently, they understand that this wouldn't be in the best interests of the children. Also, who wants to put that kind of stress on your body. Unless you are into polygamy, no woman smart enough to make that kind of money is that stupid. Breeding like rats is for the ignorant and uneducated.

Answer 2

What would be so ego stroking about reproducing 20 kids. Reproduction does not equate to vitality. That is just such an archaic ideology. Dontcha get it, reproduction is a value of those with less money. Having litters of children is the reason so many of the poor get poorer. If you researched the number of children that 99% of the worlds richest have, you will find that most of them have less than 5. That will include multiple marriages.

Answer 3

They probably do, all with different mummies.

First up is a question of logistics.... would the wife seriously want to squeeze (or cesarean) out more than 3 or 4 kids? I don't think so....
And could you imagine the problems involved with having so many kids in the same family? Jealousy would burn, as they all want attention not just the money

If you're minted you'd attract the ladies like nobody's business, as they love the money and power.

And if they did have their wicked way with these ladies, there's a good chance protection won't be used as:
a) The guy can afford to fix any 'mistakes'
b) The girl would have a love child of the billionaire and it would be her ticket to an easy life where he'll have to pay maintenance each month, or some hefty pay off

Just my 2 cents compared to a billionaire's !

Answer 4

The qualities that allow a person to become a billionaire is probably the very same reason/factor why they don't raise 20 kids by themselves. They know better than to do that. Many rich people are actually misers, both with their time and love.
But it was necessary for them becoming successful int the first place.

Answer 5

LOL. I think you are onto something here!

Yes, it's true though. At lease billionaires can afford children.

But usually it's the other way around, it's the poor Mexican people who have 11 children and they can't pick enough apples or peaches or oranges (or mow enough lawns) to take care of the kids. It's sad.

Take Care

Answer 6

Billioniares do not have time to relate with their wives to produce more children because they have been eaten up by worries. Take a closer look at people in poorer countries they have more time with their wives and produce more babies since they are idle and have little to worry about.

Answer 7

With 20+ kids, they'd have no time to make more money. After a while, the money isn't the major goal, however. Haven't you even heard the expression, "money is power?"

Answer 8

If they were smart enough to become a billionaire, they were obviously smart enough to avoid having a herd of kids.

Answer 9

Because most people who are wealthly prefer to spend their money on their self and prefer to be pampered than to have to pamper a child.

Answer 10

I can imagine every one of those 20 druggie-no-gooder owning a medium-size yatch and dating a silicone enhanced character......

A waste, wudnt u say.