English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

58 answers

Bad. So, then it can be covered up by the good.

2007-07-12 06:06:56 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 2 0

Bad news first.

2007-07-11 21:27:51 · answer #2 · answered by Michelle 4 · 1 0

Bad news then good news

2007-07-11 21:16:42 · answer #3 · answered by Llama 3 · 1 0

Bad news.

2007-07-11 21:17:07 · answer #4 · answered by Judas Rabbi 7 · 1 0

bad news first! because then the good news help make the bad news not so bad!

2007-07-11 21:18:05 · answer #5 · answered by wildflower 2 · 1 0

Bad first, that way the Good news could cheer me up right after. If Good news came first then Bad, I'd be bummed afterward and depressed.

2007-07-11 21:17:19 · answer #6 · answered by Chaun 3 · 1 0

the bad news first

2007-07-11 21:17:09 · answer #7 · answered by sparrow 4 · 1 0

The bad news. Maybe the good news afterwards could make me feel better about the bad news.

2007-07-11 21:16:27 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 1 0

Good. If I hear the bad news first, whatever good news can't cheer me up. So I'd rather be happy for a moment than never at all.

2007-07-11 21:19:10 · answer #9 · answered by HopeGrace 4 · 1 0

bad news first

2007-07-12 00:54:12 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 1 0

bad news first because then the good news makes you feel better

2007-07-11 21:17:24 · answer #11 · answered by Bryan M. 2 · 1 0

fedest.com, questions and answers