Bad. So, then it can be covered up by the good.
2007-07-12 06:06:56
·
answer #1
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
0⤋
Bad news first.
2007-07-11 21:27:51
·
answer #2
·
answered by Michelle 4
·
1⤊
0⤋
Bad news then good news
2007-07-11 21:16:42
·
answer #3
·
answered by Llama 3
·
1⤊
0⤋
Bad news.
2007-07-11 21:17:07
·
answer #4
·
answered by Judas Rabbi 7
·
1⤊
0⤋
bad news first! because then the good news help make the bad news not so bad!
2007-07-11 21:18:05
·
answer #5
·
answered by wildflower 2
·
1⤊
0⤋
Bad first, that way the Good news could cheer me up right after. If Good news came first then Bad, I'd be bummed afterward and depressed.
2007-07-11 21:17:19
·
answer #6
·
answered by Chaun 3
·
1⤊
0⤋
the bad news first
2007-07-11 21:17:09
·
answer #7
·
answered by sparrow 4
·
1⤊
0⤋
The bad news. Maybe the good news afterwards could make me feel better about the bad news.
2007-07-11 21:16:27
·
answer #8
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋
Good. If I hear the bad news first, whatever good news can't cheer me up. So I'd rather be happy for a moment than never at all.
2007-07-11 21:19:10
·
answer #9
·
answered by HopeGrace 4
·
1⤊
0⤋
bad news first
2007-07-12 00:54:12
·
answer #10
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋
bad news first because then the good news makes you feel better
2007-07-11 21:17:24
·
answer #11
·
answered by Bryan M. 2
·
1⤊
0⤋