hmmm.....
how many terrorist attacks have there been in America since 9-11?
That should answer your question
2007-07-11 20:47:44
·
answer #1
·
answered by billybutsky 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
Going into Iraq has accomplished nothing positive. the majority of the effects of the Iraq war has been negative for all of us.
On the other hand going into Afghanistan has accomplished something, but our focus on Iraq has pretty much negated all of those gains.
The chatter from cons today has been "Has there been another attack on our soil?". As if they are trying to draw a connection between our safety and Iraq. They must really be desperate. Iraq takes away from Afghanistan/Pakistan. This should have been our sole focus from the beginning because controlling that is making us safer.
2007-07-12 18:57:05
·
answer #2
·
answered by Kwame M 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
Emanuel Goldstien was the enemy of the state in Orwell's book 1984
It turns out that Goldstien was a state sponsored enemy - soley created by the state and so managed by the state -
In his book there was perpetual war - Citizens were watched for security - Always monitored -
Orwell in 1948 could not have imagined to technology of today - but you get the idea
He struggles to recall a time when men were free knowing that the "ministry of truth concerns itself with lies" The ministry of love with torture -
That the thought police could plug into your wire at any time
---------
So in his book 1984 - the enemy Goldstien - was hated hunted and yet never captured - threats of Goldstien were made just prior to and for the purpose of the State as Goldstien was the state as well as the enemy
He served to flush out the traitor he served to justify the wars he served to justify the security measures -
In short he served
Big brother loved the people and took care of them and Big brother kept the people of 1984 safe from Emanuel Goldstien
"There are no laws as all laws have been abolished - except for thought crime that is "
"War is peace -Freedom is slavery Ignorance is strength " "The three sacred principles of INSO "George Orwell's book 1984 written in 1948
2007-07-12 12:09:35
·
answer #3
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
He is afraid to go into Pakistan because they are one of the Nuclear 7 (nuclear superpowers). Also, he WILL NOT capture Bin Laden, he and his family are too good of friends with the Bin Laden family. If he caught Osama, they rest of the Bin Ladens might take offense and the Bush's would be out millions of dollars from their oil company (being that the Bin Laden's were partial financial backers).
2007-07-12 02:50:40
·
answer #4
·
answered by br@ini@c 6
·
1⤊
0⤋
I honestly believe now, he is purposely trying to divide America. He has given nothing to America that is constructive, unless you count lessons from failure. I really think he is a mole, he has done more for our enemies since Lyndon Johnson. Sorry about the timing of that remark, but isn't that convienient?
2007-07-12 03:32:36
·
answer #5
·
answered by grey smily 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
Bush killed saddam, occupied americans with lies, gave our debt to china, invested more heavily in oil, gave oil companies the green light for raising prices, then made us give him 500 billion dollars for a war that had nothing to do with the war on terror, while making people believe it did.
2007-07-12 02:53:01
·
answer #6
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
0⤋
Bush has not accomplished much. A lot of intelligent people vote him the worst president EVER. Not "one of the" they said ever.
2007-07-12 02:52:15
·
answer #7
·
answered by kijafha 3
·
2⤊
0⤋
Nada, it means all that money spent towards offense should have been spent towards defense in America. Us being in Iraq is reactive not retroactive.
2007-07-12 02:51:36
·
answer #8
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
0⤋
a divided America and the quagmire
2007-07-12 02:47:25
·
answer #9
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
0⤋