A ill-tempered, violent, foul mouthed, hateful and abusive woman wants to be your president and have total control as commander-in-chief of a military that her party so openly and proudly admit they detest....in place of guns, body armour and combat boots will be ....A tie-dyed tee shirt, A hacky sack, and filp flops...A liberals dream
2007-07-11 19:06:45 · 11 answers · asked by arwilcox187 2 in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
Hillary is more a commander in squeef... Hillary loves all that is anti American.Her socialist views show her complete disdain for mainstream America. along with the snappy liberal atire, one can imagine gay pride parades across the whitehouse lawn, NAMBLA events in the oval office, BJ Clinton back with the interns, and embracing islam with open arms....
2007-07-11 19:19:30 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 4⤋
You forget it was the Liberal Clinton, the husband of this Liberal woman who brought the US Military to the modern ages, Not Bush Sr, neither Ronald Regan, but this Liberal Bill Clinton.
And under this Conservative Bush we have our military blown away everyday and not have enough body armor while they build a $5 Billion dollar Embassy. And under this Conservative Bush, was a soldier who asked about body armor told by Rumy that, "you go to war with the resources you have". PATHETIC.
You should be grateful that this woman wants to be President, and you know she will make our Military proud, unlike the Pathetic failure called Bush.
2007-07-12 02:27:30 · answer #2 · answered by Dangerous 2 · 3⤊ 1⤋
And not a thing about her politics, just jabs at her personality, which don't seem to me to describe her much at all. Ill-tempered? So she's ill tempered at times, big whoop. The next time Rudy or McCain loses their temper will you accuse them of being ill-tempered or just be proud of them for being mad as hell Republicans? I bet Dubya's just singing "Don't Worry Be Happy" all the damn time these days. Foul mouthed? I don't care if she swears - do you really think all the candidates say darn and fudge every time they're riled up? As long as she isn't cussing at the American people or a head of state, I could care less.
Violent? Where did you get that from, that's completely out of left field. Abusive? That one really takes the cake, who has she abused, who's poor little feelings has she hurt?
The Democratic Party doesn't detest our military. Show us one quote from a Democrat saying they hate our military. They're the ones complaining about our soldiers dying and losing limbs every day while they police a civil war instead of dealing with Al Queda all over the rest of Iraq and in Afghanistan. You obviously don't know anything about Sen. Clinton. The woman is a hawk, a cautious hawk that believes in -- gasp! -- diplomacy, but she won't hesitate to use our military to defend ourselves whenever necessary.
But keep drinking that Kool Aid if it makes you feel good.
2007-07-12 02:26:30 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 4⤊ 3⤋
Nice try bubba... now validate any of the disinformation you spewed?
Hillary is not a ill-tempered, violent, foul mouthed, hateful and abusive woman. She is an honorable woman who has served her country well as First lady and now as a senator -- whom by the way was re-elected.
Are bold faces lies\mindless rants the best way to go about attempting to build up a dislike for her?
You are the weakest link... you're dismissed!
2007-07-12 03:57:08 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 3⤋
If you don't want Hillary as president, why not support Ron Paul? 70% of the country opposes the war, so the GOP must run an anti-war candidate if they don't want to watch Hillary enter the White House. Ron Paul, a staunch opponent of the Federal Reserve and the IRS who wants to repeal both of them and replace them with nothing, is the most fiscally conservative member of Congress in history. He's also more socially conservative than the other GOP frontrunners (Rudy McRomney is well-known to be pro-abortion, but Fred Thompson lobbied for abortion clinics and was a strong supporter of McCain-Feingold; see http://www.conservativesbetrayed.com/gw3/articles-latestnews/articles.php?CMSArticleID=1827&CMSCategoryID=19 for proof).
Republicans should support Ron Paul, whether they agree with him on foreign policy or not, because he is the only Republican that can beat Hillary in 2008 and even if you disagree with him on the War, you'd have to be a socialist to prefer Hillary to Ron Paul.
2007-07-12 02:23:32 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 4⤋
Considering we've already seen what you neo-con, war mongering, lying, money grubbing, untrust worthy, holy roller fascism prefer for a president ..... someone with some common sense would be refreshing.
2007-07-12 02:37:13 · answer #6 · answered by ndmagicman 7 · 3⤊ 2⤋
Getting cold and clammy under that rock?
2007-07-12 02:18:57 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 4⤊ 1⤋
Not flip flops (unless your talking policy), its Birkenstocks!!! What all the hippies wear!
2007-07-12 02:10:30 · answer #8 · answered by iroteb 5 · 1⤊ 6⤋
no, but i wouldn't vote for any fictional character that you propogandists dream up.
2007-07-12 02:14:08 · answer #9 · answered by avail_skillz 7 · 3⤊ 3⤋
Anyone would be better than the idiot Bush.
Even a dishwasher/
2007-07-12 02:14:45 · answer #10 · answered by NightShade 3 · 6⤊ 5⤋