voted for him the 1st time but not the 2nd. Bush would have been a good president if he had a better vp. Cheney is a bully. I really think he's pulling the strings.
2007-07-11 17:03:58
·
answer #1
·
answered by BIG RED 2
·
1⤊
1⤋
As a Republican, i'll admit the mistake of giving Bush the Republican nomination in 2004.
But it was not a mistake to vote for Bush over Kerry in 2004.
Kerry as President is just plain scary to think about.
So you should be blaming the Democratic Party for nominating such a weak candiate in 2004.
It's almost like they wanted to lose the election on purpose.
2007-07-12 00:08:23
·
answer #2
·
answered by jeeper_peeper321 7
·
1⤊
0⤋
I still believe it was the right thing to do. I still support the war but I no longer support Bush due to his ineptitude concerning border enforcement
Do you honestly think that buffoon Kerry could have handled the situation better than Bush.
The Democrats putting that guy up as the candidate made it easy to vote for Bush.
If they ran the same race again (if there were no term limits) I would have to hold my nose and vote for Bush over Kerry again.
2007-07-12 00:22:20
·
answer #3
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋
Bush or Flip Flop? WOW that was a hard choice. I support the war, but I won't fund it. My family is conserves fuel, thats why I drive my Suburban. I am a Catholic, but I support ABORTION. GIVE ME A BREAK!!! The man couldn't keep anything straight and on the same side of the fence. Depending on who would run against Bush for a third term, if he could, I may have to vote for him a third time. There is no one in the Dem party that I would vote for, thats running now.
2007-07-12 01:03:46
·
answer #4
·
answered by bombinbrian 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
I voted for Bush both times...my choices were limited and Lerch did not have the cajones to become President.
I don't agree with Bush on lots of topics, but I will be damned if I would elect someone who accused our boys in Vietnam of being murderers!!!
2007-07-12 00:06:59
·
answer #5
·
answered by iroteb 5
·
1⤊
0⤋
I would vote for Bush over Kerry any day of the week.
And who says anything about a mistake...you cannot evalute history in a short span of time. You know that....but then again...maybe you don't.
and I wouldn't be surprise.
2007-07-12 00:03:29
·
answer #6
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋
No I don't "realize my mistake" and given the same 2 people running I would do it again. Kerry is a traitor that should have never been allowed back in the Country and one I would not want in the Oval office.
2007-07-11 23:58:27
·
answer #7
·
answered by smsmith500 7
·
3⤊
1⤋
Bush was voted in the 2nd time for we had no alternative, Kerry just couldnt clean up that mess, its simply the Democratic partys fault for giving us no canidate
2007-07-11 23:58:03
·
answer #8
·
answered by Anonymous
·
3⤊
0⤋
“It is not the critic who counts, not the man who points out how the strong man stumbled, or where the doer of deeds could have done them better. The credit belongs to the man who is actually in the arena; whose face is marred by dust and sweat and blood; who strives valiantly; who errs and comes short again and again; who knows the great enthusiasms, the great devotions, and spends himself in a worthy cause; who, at the best, knows in the end the triumph of high achievement; and who, at worst, if he fails, at least fails while daring greatly, so that his place shall never be with those cold and timid souls who know neither victory nor defeat.”
~ Teddy Roosevelt
2007-07-11 23:58:56
·
answer #9
·
answered by Anonymous
·
3⤊
0⤋
I voted for Bush both times, I still support Bush, and I would've voted for a sack of spuds over Kerry.
2007-07-12 00:01:48
·
answer #10
·
answered by Anonymous
·
3⤊
1⤋