English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

Donna was my biggest, she was 9lb 15oz & 23 1/2 inches long, she was actually easy to deliver, apart from a small tear, Abbey was my smallest, she was six weeks early, but still weighed 6lb 13oz, the hospital said she could easily have exceeded Donna had she gone full term, well thank god she didnt lol. she was very hard to deliver because she was stressed & they wanted her out quicker than she was coming

2007-07-11 16:07:45 · 29 answers · asked by Lita M 2 in Pregnancy & Parenting Pregnancy

Good on you Jammys for admitting that it could possibly hurt lol, imaging your ***** being twice the size, solid as a rock & over a foot long!!!! would you agree that if it was down to the fellas to give birth we would be a nation of single child family's, I had no pain relief with any of my kids, (not brave or stupid just bad reactions to meds)

2007-07-11 16:53:11 · update #1

29 answers

4 kids
first-6lb 11 emergency section
second-5lb 4 -5 weeks early and in labour for an hour at most
third-7lb 4- that hurt lol]
fourth- 6lb 5 that hurt more
no pain releif as i never bothered going to hospital till last minute-i think the 5lb was the easiest and all those after were hard just because i knew what was coming- im crossing my legs just thinking about it ouchhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhh lol

2007-07-11 18:44:07 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 1 0

My first baby(Martha) was the smallest at 5 lbs, 3 oz and my last (Katie) was the biggest at 9 lbs 10.5 ounces. Even though Katie was bigger she was the easiest delivery I had. I went to a hypnotist for pain free childbirth sessions. Not only did I have a LOT less pain, the whole delivery was quicker and easier. And, Katie was so much more laid back as an infant than Martha. I"m out of the baby business now but if I got pregnant again I would definitely go back to the hypnotist.

2007-07-11 16:25:12 · answer #2 · answered by duck 1 · 0 1

Katelyn 5lbs 2ozs 19 inches long
Noah 5lbs 5ozs 19 1/2 inches long
Colin ????? Due in December

Katelyn was the hardest due to major tearing and an epidural that worked too well and I couldn't feel to push.
With Noah I think that nature and experience took over and made things a little easier along with an epidural that never took.
We'll just have to wait and see how Colin(found out last week that it is DEFINATELY a boy!!!!!!!) does in December!

2007-07-11 16:22:48 · answer #3 · answered by ? 4 · 0 0

My first child was 6 lb, 5 oz. The labor for her was long and very painful! Ouch!!!!! My son was 9 lb, 6.5 oz. The labor for him didn't hurt much until his shoulders got stuck and the doctor had to shove on my lower abdomen repeatedly to help him come out. My third baby was 6 lb, 13 oz. I had a c-section with her. It was by far my best birth. However, the end products of all three deliveries were great!

2007-07-11 16:29:20 · answer #4 · answered by piano2897 2 · 0 0

My largest was Brenna, 3 weeks early at 6lbs and 2 oz. Her delivery was hard, all natural, back labor and pushed for over 2 1/2 hrs (I was only in labor for 3 1/2 hrs).

Peter was my small one, 6 weeks early at 5lbs 8oz. He was 6 weeks early and I had the epidural for my Doctor and my husband. I had been in labor on and off for almost 2 months and they both told me that I deserved a break and I am grateful that I had it. With the epidural I wasn't in pain and I felt every contraction and was able to push effectively and pushed for only 10 minutes and we had our boy. Not really they wouldn't let us have him right away but he was the easy delivery.

2007-07-11 16:16:18 · answer #5 · answered by New England Babe 7 · 0 0

:) The first one for me was the most painful and she was only 4 lbs 11 oz!! My son would be the second painful and he was 8 lbs 3 oz and my other daughter would be the least at 6 lbs 11 oz. My first came so quick I would almost like to say she was the easiest. But my second came quick too (on the ambulance stretcher) so I think it's a toss up!

2007-07-11 16:13:53 · answer #6 · answered by momofthreemiracles 5 · 0 0

Well, Katie was my 1st, she was 9lb 10oz and was by far the worst. I had a failed epidural, I was in hospital for 5 days whilst they tried unsuccsessfully to induce me. She is 23 months now.
Daniel was 10lb 7oz and he was the easiest! No pain relief, I went into hospital at 8.30am and was back at home by 4pm.
He is now 6 months old.
Currently baking no. 3.....I must be nuts!

2007-07-11 21:56:20 · answer #7 · answered by Rogue 2 · 0 0

Well my two were surprisingly close in size. My son was 7lb 3 oz, and my daugther was 7lb 2oz. She was easier to deliver but think its because I was kneeling when I gave birth so gravity helped her out, where as with my son I was on my back, which is apparently the worst position for choosing to give birth in. And I guess it may have been easier as she was my 2nd?

2007-07-11 21:15:24 · answer #8 · answered by doodlebip 4 · 0 0

my first was the hardest 7lb 13oz and second 9lb 6 oz and one big push,no grazing or tearing, easy! but so painful.
I'm 28 weeks with baby#3 and I'm hoping the baby is as easy.
i don't think the size matters but the the head circumference and your pushing ability and the midwives holding your perineum properly.

2007-07-11 16:19:14 · answer #9 · answered by gym junkie mummy 4 · 0 0

Reese was 9 lb 3 oz & 21 inches.

Reiker was 7 lb 15 oz & 20 inches.

Delaney was 7 lb 8 oz & 21 inches.

Delaney hurt the most! I still can't figure out why.

2007-07-11 16:12:21 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers