... engagement.
That's an admission that his people messed up royally and would NEVER be allowed to follow the failed decisions that were made by Reno and Clinton's ATF.
Right?
So, why wasn't Clinton charged?
2007-07-11 15:48:32 · 17 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
If you could tell me, why Bush and Cheney are not impeached yet, considering the amount of damage and incompetence they've done!! We will be able to find an answer to your Que. too!
2007-07-11 15:54:03 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 1⤋
Remember all them , nearly a hundred people he fired when he walked in the white house after being elected (like Bush's 8 or 9), Bill replaced them with his cronies, some from Arkansas and some from the Rose Law Firm, where Hillary worked at, cheating seniors out of their property. That is why, he was never charged. Besides do you really think the Clinton's care about kids, just a election tactic. Wonder why people are not yelling how Clinton killed all them civilians and children, that inferno of fire they set them self. right here in his own country. I watched the whole thing from day one on TV, it was awful. Think this is something, you need to research them two, they did not get the nicknames, slick willy and Hillary the devil for nothing.
2007-07-11 16:44:51 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Well, as much as I think *somebody* should have gone down for the totally unlawful siege at Waco, there's a principle in law that taking corrective measures does not indicate guilt or responsibility.
Clinton was probably at worst incompetent for creating the atmosphere that allowed (if not encouraged) it to happen, but I'm not sure it rose to criminal levels on his part. Maybe, but probably not.
2007-07-11 15:55:25 · answer #3 · answered by open4one 7 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Because if you charge Clinton with killing 32 American kids in Waco, you'd have to charge Bush with killing more than 2000 U.S. Soldiers, as well as thousands of Iraqi, and Afghan's citizens.
2007-07-11 16:00:15 · answer #4 · answered by Patrick C 1 · 2⤊ 0⤋
Reno bent over backwards trying to get the nut cases at Waco to come out. It's likely they killed themselves.
An Attorney General is in place to enforce the laws, not walk away from criminal acts like Alberto Gonzalez has.
2007-07-11 15:56:03 · answer #5 · answered by Michael da Man 6 · 3⤊ 0⤋
Don't our Presidents have enough to deal with? Were you watching the repeated attempts to get the group to come out?
It's only those who are desperate to hurt our President for political reasons that keep this stuff alive.
Enough.
At the same time, your question isn't seditious. It's just annoying. Our Presidents go through so much nonsense.
I'm sorry if I was harsh. If you want me to remove part of my post, I will. It might be a better lesson on how we treat each other to leave it up with this note.
2007-07-11 16:06:47 · answer #6 · answered by mckenziecalhoun 7 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Kind of like poor innocent Vince Foster Somehow Bush will get blamed for this too
2007-07-11 16:03:09 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
Minor girls were targeted by Koresh for sex as "child brides." This was sanctioned sexual abuse. Girls as young as ten were groomed to become Koresh's sexual partners.
It was never the intent to kill anyone. Koresh and his group held out for almost two months. They should have come out if they were doing nothing wrong. Since this was a "Christian" group, I guess we need to give them a pass.
2007-07-11 15:58:12 · answer #8 · answered by wooper 5 · 2⤊ 0⤋
UMMMM....I'd hate to tell you but if my memory serves me well Reno didn't start the job until 3 days later.
Ooops.
2007-07-11 16:29:44 · answer #9 · answered by George W. B 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Clinton wasn't charged because the liberal media is too busy trying to make Bush and the Democrats look bad so Hillary can get elected.
2007-07-11 15:55:45 · answer #10 · answered by don n 6 · 1⤊ 4⤋