Even if the war in Iraq continues to require a substantial American troop commitment.
Should we attack Iran?
2007-07-11 15:34:06 · 11 answers · asked by wooper 5 in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
I think we should just bomb their nuclear facilities, then let the masses finish off the government. Many Iranians are rioting in the streets, so they maybe getting close to civil war.
2007-07-11 15:39:44 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋
Lieberman is posturing. An attack on Iran will require an incident some where else to justify. Israel may be the first in, that's why Lieberman is speaking about it. Think about it though, what would be the consequences of an attack like this?
2007-07-11 22:42:22 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 0⤋
No we shouldn't attack Iran. We can't even get Iraq or Afghanistan on the right track. Do people really want the world to look like it is in the middle east that Bush and Cheney caused? Is this what people want as their model in how to conduct business and relations with other countries? If so, I'd say there are alot of sociopathic sick people out there.
2007-07-11 22:38:22 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋
What Iranian nuclear crisis? They aren't going to have a workable weapon for at least 5 years. Then they'd have to develop an operational system that could deliver it.
Even if they are develping a nuclear weapon. So far, that's not established.
2007-07-11 22:38:52 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
That's what happens when you have a senator that's a dual U.S./Israeli citizen.
How in the hell can Lieberman be expected to be a rational judge of any situation in Iran, or Iraq for that matter?
U2zep---don't you DARE infer that I'm a "Democrat".
2007-07-11 22:42:33 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
Joe Lieberman. He's one of the few demos I have come to respect. Poor ole Joe, Like Ron Paul, both have been ostracized for not playing ball with the power brokers!
2007-07-11 22:43:53 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋
should we attack iran?
what a ridiculous question in light of the current situation in iraq and it's effect on the military as a whole.
seriously...
to responder mark... do you always find genocide "INTERESTING".
how american of you.
wow
2007-07-11 22:49:47 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
Let Hillary surrender to Iran.
Gypsy, Can you answer this question. Who did the DEMS vote to be their next VP when Gore ran for president? The Dems loved Joe back then. LOL
2007-07-11 22:49:16 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
Not until they give up their right to sovereignty. They have to attack another country (like Kuwait, or paying suicide bombers to attack Israel, or attempt to assassinate a President like the elder President Bush). When they do, then we'll attack.
Until then, well, we don't do that.
2007-07-11 22:42:02 · answer #9 · answered by mckenziecalhoun 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
interesting
2007-07-11 22:38:29 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋