Dude, we both know that a strong Al Qaeda will weaken Bush.
Neo-libs have done nothing other than attempt to weaken Bush (I hear our great congress has nearly 300 anti Bush hearings in progress at the moment) in an effort to win the white house.
I think neo-libs would would gladly sacrifice another 3000 Americans if it could destroy the Bush administration and guarantee a presidential victory in '08.
Disagree?
Then tell me exactly what the neo-lib congress has done to keep our country safe?
2007-07-12 15:51:32
·
answer #1
·
answered by GIVRO 3
·
2⤊
1⤋
6:30 a.m. ... hello ... I just had to say EXCUSE ME?
From the "answers" you're getting I believe that too many people have forgotten 9/11 already. Do they actually believe that Al Qaeda will leave the West alone if we get out of Iraq? I seem to remember that they attacked the hell out of the U.S. before we even went over there.
Here is a reminder, with a tip of the hat to you, Dude:
http://www.gunstuff.com/america-attacked.html
The War: Didn't Congress vote FOR it?
And wasn't it Prez Clinton who let Bin Laden get away after the FIRST time they tried to bomb the trade center?
Yes, Al Qaeda is stronger than ever, and the Bush haters are thrilled. But that said, something still need to be done. Al Qaeda is in northern Pakistan.
Let's roll.
2007-07-12 00:38:39
·
answer #2
·
answered by Bad Kitty! 7
·
1⤊
2⤋
sure, all sixteen US intelligence companies have concluded that Al Qaeda is enhanced than ever. they might not lie in this uncomplicated end to any extent further than they lied while they sent Bush as Presidential daily short in August 2001 which suggested that Al Qaeda grow to be desperate to strike interior the U. S. and deliberate to hijack airplanes.
2016-12-10 09:27:39
·
answer #3
·
answered by snetsinger 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
Al Qaeda is stronger than ever because of Bush's greed. If he'd addressed the problem of terrorism after 9/11, Al Qaeda might not be the force it is now.
But he didn't do that. Instead he used terrorism as an excuse to increase the power and wealth of the oil and arms industries.
His corruption has fed into Al Qaeda's hands. Who do you think will pay the price for that?
2007-07-11 15:01:56
·
answer #4
·
answered by Anonymous
·
6⤊
3⤋
We empowered the enemy? Just how is that, I mean an ill conceived war in an arab nation that had NOTHING to do with 9/11 might just be a Jihadists best recruiting tool their Bucko and no we're not happy we just are willing to point out the absurdity of YOUR Presidents FAILED actions
2007-07-11 15:01:26
·
answer #5
·
answered by Anonymous
·
5⤊
3⤋
Stronger? You mean their numbers have grown from 200 to 2000 since our destruction and occupation of Muslim Iraq?
I am a citizen of a great nation; too great to be conquered by a few thousand men. You make Bin Laden out to be a god.
Grow a pair.
2007-07-11 15:01:30
·
answer #6
·
answered by CaesarLives 5
·
1⤊
2⤋
are you talking about the information that was released from the white house ? Was that the info that came out hours after Bushes ratings were so low ? Could there be a connection, ?
2007-07-11 15:06:55
·
answer #7
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
1⤋
Yeah right. The US ran al Qaeda out of Afghanistan. into the hills of Tora Bora. Then Bush called our special forces out and had them invade Iraq who had no al Qaeda connections. Bush created one.
2007-07-11 15:05:33
·
answer #8
·
answered by Anonymous
·
4⤊
2⤋
Dude the war that the president (you elected into office) who put us in this war against terrorism has failed and now look at the mess he has made...I am not happy...I am angry at people like you who actually think WE liberals are the ones enjoying the terrorists gaining power when Conservatives were the ones who put us into this war, mishandled it and now caused the dreaded outcome of terrorism becoming more powerful when the new mission was to stop it.
2007-07-11 15:03:00
·
answer #9
·
answered by Lindsey G 5
·
3⤊
3⤋
No we are not happy - I would have thought it would be the cons who are happy.
After all
1. You are the ones working at helping them recruit new members having removed the blockage to them gaining a power base in Iraq
2. This enables you to continue your war on abstract nouns and make sure more our tax money (and our children's money) makes it's way to the coffers of the defence contractors that paid to have your boys elected.
2007-07-11 15:01:27
·
answer #10
·
answered by Sageandscholar 7
·
4⤊
2⤋