al-Qaida. What do you make of this report, combined with Chertoff's gut feeling of another attack this summer?

Question

http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20070711/ap_on_go_ca_st_pe/us_terror_threat

My question. If they have this much detailed information, the number three man giving them information, why are we getting reports and no actions to kill, capture or damage them as much as possible? My President stood on a pile of rubble in NYC telling the world we're coming to get them, you can either help us or be a part of the problem. Why are we not getting them if we are supposed to be fighting al-Qaida WHEREVER they are? You're either with us, or against us. What happened to that statement? I'm totally against us still being in Iraq but if this IS true, it's totally inexcusable.

Answer 1

My first suspicion is that the administration is using the "monsters under the bed" tactic to put more people in the Republican camp. Maybe I'm cynical.

Answer 2

My gut feeling is that it's suddenly going to be hard for the FBI to get warrants from the secret court again. The attack will come next summer. Just in time to skip the elections and declare martial law.

Answer 3

We capture all the sound waves in the air, decode or demodulate them, and determine who's voice it is.
Satellites can pinpoint on a dime and see year it was minted. Thy are even capable to see inside a building.
And these are the ones public knows about. So many gadget and so much high tech, it is very hard to believe that La din is still at large.

Best Regards.

Answer 4

maximum of it is scare strategies. yet remember: no longer all which you spot in the media is complete as scare strategies. a number of it is possibly to be approximately applying the media for prevention, it is, if terrorists visual demonstrate unit the information they're given the message: we are gazing you and we are waiting in case you think of you are able to plan an attack. Now, I comprehend this could no longer be newsworthy or maybe smart, although this is no longer all with regard to the Bush administration's tries at extra professional-conflict propaganda. The scare strategies coming from the Bush administration come extra in this variety of Bush's speeches--while he talks approximately smoking weapons and mushroom clouds. while Bush himself speaks to the media he employs scare strategies that the media then play up for the sake of sensationalizing. this is a vicious cycle kind extra advantageous than one intentional, even though it nevertheless desires to be uncovered as scare strategies and propaganda. while Al Qaida says they are going to "attack lower back," you have no longer have been given any way of understanding in the event that they too are merely applying scare strategies. Too many human beings confound the asserting "this is extra suitable to be risk-free than sorry" with turning out to be paranoid at each and every "intelligence" record you spot in the media claiming the NSA has some new information. it is unlucky because of the fact it contributes to the pro-conflict mentality that TO this present day confuses what's occurring in Iraq with some "conflict" against worldwide terrorism. one extra element: There are "credible" intelligence comments, such because of the fact the single British anti-terrorist brokers used to capture culprits at Heathrow who have been waiting to apply liquid explosives of a few type on planes headed for the U.S. needless to say, once you are the genuine conspiracy theorist, you will think of the form could have been staged. Who knows?-- yet it is the element while it includes at present's media. this is Oceania obtainable.

Answer 5

I'd be shocked if there was another attack this summer. If that were to happen the Democrats would win 75% of the seats in Congress in the 2008 elections as well as the White House. There is no way the GOP is going to allow that to happen so I have to believe we will be safe until at least January 2009.

Answer 6

It's like people tried to explain to Bush... get out of Iraq and get back into Afghanistan. Bush's incompetence is just plain getting dangerous now.

Answer 7

I agree. Why didn't they just put a 5 million dollar contract out on the main players? They can't tell me that the CIA hasn't hunted and killed people threatening our security before; why couldn't they do it this time? Oh, that's right ... war makes people rich. God Bless America

Answer 8

hegelian principles, bro.
problem
reaction
solution
the administration needs more problems(attacks) so that they can create fear(reaction) in order to offer solution(continued MIS-leadership)

http://www.scroogle.org/cgi-bin/nbbw.cgi
http://www.whitehouse.gov/news/releases/2007/05/20070509-12.html

Answer 9

No evidence just a "gut" feeling ..omg..unbelievable! Just an attempt at detraction from Bush's waning poll numbers...

Answer 10

Do you think it could be possible that Bush leaked the report?