Millions of NGOs working in this issue, but the problem is still FRESH and even growing around the world. I tested by myself on how painful being hungry would be. I swear, its really painful. I just could not imagine, millions of people going to their bed HUNGRY every day. What are we really doing to our fellow human being ? ? ? Is there no remedy for this ? ? ? With all these technological developments and intellectual developments, as human beings we are still not able to feed ourselves, where are we heading to ? ? ? . I get frustrated whenever I see UN in the news in poverty related matters. These agencies are funded good and have their presence worldwide for AGES. Are these agencies really working ? ? ? is it United Nations OR United Nonsense ? ? ?
2007-07-11 11:49:18 · 16 answers · asked by k_karikolraj 2 in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
It's not up to governments and the UN to end poverty
It's up to people to stop producing children they cannot afford to feed
2007-07-11 11:53:58 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 3⤋
The US gives millions & millons each year to feed the world's hungry.
The UN is Corrupt, and the millions doesn't feed hardly any.
JOHN BOLTON was going to Stop the Corruption in the UN.
But the Democrats stopped him.
The Democrat Party and the Corrupt UN are working together.
The Democrats will let the people starve. They always have.
(Farmers do Not destroy their grain, nor dump their milk. Only a foreigner would think that.)
2007-07-11 11:55:05 · answer #2 · answered by wolf 6 · 3⤊ 0⤋
Yes! The UN is a big joke. Why would you count on them for anything? Realistically, what have they done in the last 20 years that has truly helped humanity?
2007-07-11 11:55:00 · answer #3 · answered by silly-asious 2 · 2⤊ 0⤋
Good question; important issue. It's difficult to provide assistance at times (Darfur, North Korea) given the lack of access. But you are right that the UN's efforts to date have not been something to be proud of.
2007-07-11 12:04:52 · answer #4 · answered by ? 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
the UN is in this country so the NSA ans CIA could have an excuse to operate on home soil, which there charters prohibit. But because the FBI was and maybe still is run by a prancing fag, they had to have someway to work around that. Hence the UN at all.
2007-07-11 11:54:29 · answer #5 · answered by briux 2 · 0⤊ 2⤋
i admire the type you think of. the reason we've thousands and thousands of persons starving is for 2 motives: a million) They stay to tell the story a barren area 2) they have greater infants than they might feed or preserve i think of that's cruel to furnish them sufficient foodstuff to in basic terms exist and that enables them to proceed with their hand out with the cup to fill primary. This additionally helps them to poop out a sparkling starving infant each and every 10 months or so. that's on no account ending.
2016-09-29 13:21:52 · answer #6 · answered by ? 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
There will always be hunger problems in this world sad to say.The UN are useless and self serving. We support them 95% money wise and get one vote.Get ride of them.
2007-07-11 11:56:38 · answer #7 · answered by ♥ Mel 7 · 2⤊ 0⤋
Lets stop paying farmers in the breadbasket of America to DUMP milk and DESTROY grain by the thousands of tons. Give it to those here and everywhere that need it.
Problem solved.
2007-07-11 11:55:28 · answer #8 · answered by Atavacron 5 · 1⤊ 0⤋
The UN hasn't had credibility for a very long time.
2007-07-11 12:01:21 · answer #9 · answered by The prophet of DOOM 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I understand that other countries are less fortunate than the US, but we also have starving people here in the states. It is funny to me when celebrities are wanting to help foreign countries and adopt children from places other than the US, when there is so much to be done here!
2007-07-11 11:53:45 · answer #10 · answered by Peachy 3 · 2⤊ 1⤋
The UN is the problem. Ron Paul is the answer.
2007-07-11 11:53:27 · answer #11 · answered by monster7273 1 · 0⤊ 1⤋