I would absolutely love to see him back in the White House.
It seems like anyone is better than Bush.
But Clinton is great.
2007-07-11 11:38:40
·
answer #1
·
answered by @$h|eY 3
·
6⤊
8⤋
properly, we dont "have" to place yet another Clinton interior the White abode, it truly is your own decision to make. All marriages are not suited and each now and then human beings make errors. Hillary could have divorced bill if she had to because of the fact she has her own funds, yet she chosen to forgive him and it would not propose that she has low ethical standards. Hillary is an extremely clever and knowledgeable woman and that i've got self assurance that she has intense ethical standards. i'm distinctly confident that bill hardly ever have been given a raffle to be certain his spouse very usually as president so it replaced into consumer-friendly for him to get tempted via a few youthful woman. i'm going to be satisfied if the two Obama or Hillary wins because of the fact i want a Democrat as president. i think of that Hillary has numerous good plans for this usa and this usa desires some exchange deseperately.
2016-10-20 21:50:21
·
answer #2
·
answered by rajkumar 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
I don't want the Clintons, the Bushs, or any other corporate whores in the White House, now or ever again.
Even though I'm a Democrat, I will not support or vote for Hillary. As soon as she gets elected, IF she's elected, the Republican propaganda machine will go on the war path and start pumping story after story into the daily news that will cripple her Presidency and the American republic. Can you stand all their crap for 4, maybe 8 years?
2007-07-11 12:38:33
·
answer #3
·
answered by Babs 7
·
2⤊
1⤋
Absolutly not. I believe that Bill Clinton just as responsible for our current condition in the world as people blame Bush for.
He cut military spending, Closed military bases, and Instituted limitations on enlistments (under Clinton they were actually paying people to get out)
Clinton also made several mistakes by ignoring ( or at least not responding) to terrorist attacks on our military throughout the 90's.
I also believe that if Clinton had not cut the military by so much America's military would not be stretched so incredibly thin now due to the fact that the military has lost so many members to horrendous policys of the Clinton administration.
2007-07-11 11:42:59
·
answer #4
·
answered by WCSteel 5
·
3⤊
2⤋
Love to see President Clinton back in the White House....YES !!!
2007-07-11 11:47:56
·
answer #5
·
answered by krissyderic 7
·
2⤊
2⤋
peace? I guess you have forgotton the million that died in Rhwanda under Clintons NEGLECT.
And what about Waco? One hundred dead there.
and the surplus? Clinton and the republican/democrat congresses he had NEVER submitted a balanced budget. They simply turned that way due to the capital gains generated by the internet stock bubble.
2007-07-11 12:00:30
·
answer #6
·
answered by Corruptfile34 5
·
2⤊
1⤋
The U.S. had budget surpluses, peace, and prosperity under the Clinton administration. Although it was distracted by Clinton's sexual misadventures, the Clinton government was keeping tabs on terrorists and the threat of Osama Bin Laden. It's an easy decision; yes, Clinton would make an excellent president for another 8 years, were that possible.
2007-07-11 11:41:47
·
answer #7
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
4⤋
Clinton & Clinton '08
2007-07-11 11:53:42
·
answer #8
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
2⤋
How many ways could Hillary ruin America? Let me count the ways.....1,2,3,.....74,75, 76...........7,683, 7684,.............21,435, 21436.....this might take a while, maybe I'll edit this later with a complete count.
Just say no to Clinton. If someone tries to give you a button or a yard sign, be firm. Say no thank you and walk away. Be sure to have the talk with your voting age children. It could save their lives.
2007-07-11 11:49:58
·
answer #9
·
answered by shrugger 4
·
1⤊
2⤋
Hmmm. Peace, General Prosperity and a Budget Surplus? I can see why a lot of folks wouldn't go for that. But it works for me.
Hell yeah! I'd take him back. Even if I did think, back in '92 that I was voting for George Clinton.
2007-07-11 11:41:55
·
answer #10
·
answered by Anonymous
·
4⤊
3⤋
That lazy, lying, sexual predator has no business being anywhere near the White House. He did nothing about terrorism, cut the military and closed bases, leaving us more vulnerable. His legacy is quite tarnished.
2007-07-11 11:51:40
·
answer #11
·
answered by stupidcaucasian 6
·
1⤊
2⤋