Can you imagine 4-8 yrs of Hillary followed by 4-8yrs of Jeb? Realistically, 2 family's could have control of our country for 36 yrs!! I think there's a word for that..
Bush Sr. 4yrs
B. Clinton 8yrs
Bush Jr. 8yrs
H.Clinton ??
2007-07-11 11:34:04 · 23 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
Yeah, the word is a farce....dynasty....bullsh*t. You pick one.....lol. Time to clean house in Washington!
2007-07-11 11:40:57 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 0⤋
W ruined it for Jeb . Not gonna happen . Neither is Hillary . She's starting out with half the country (at least) not liking her . Never say never, but I think it's too much to overcome
. She won the Senate because NYC is 3-to-1Democratic , & her opponents were less than great . In 2000 , it was an empty suit , & probable Newt Gingrich rubber stamp for the GOP, & an organic farmer (my vote), unknown outside of Delaware County, on a shoestring budget . Last year , she was the incumbent , so started with a huge advantage . I can't even remember the Republican candidate . The Consevative Party candidate said she was 100% behind, & in agreement with President Bush . (BZZZZzzzzt! WRONG! - must have forgot what state she was in, or that NYC voters see things a bit differently than the rest of the state. ) The rest were a collection of "Who?"s. ( I did a write-in, for a neighbor .;D)Not going to be so easy for Hillary in a national election, so no I'm not scared, at least by that . Romney, & his affirmative view of "The president can do what he wants because he's the president" Bush/Cheney Doctrine? That's scary!
2007-07-11 11:58:21 · answer #2 · answered by mikeinportc 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Want happen, Hillary will not be the President, people are to smart to put that criminal team back in the white house. As for as Bush, I think when he is out of office, there want be any more. Jeb is not running. I do think that the Clinton's and their cronies will try in yrs to put their daughter in there, but if she is smart, she will not want to be there, you know she knows all the criminal dealing history of her parent's. Now we got another Kennedy thinking about running, I hope voters realize the Kennedy mistress stories, and this one is no better than the others, same blood runs in his veins too. I am for fresh names, fresh congress and put them out. This is the only way anything positive is going to happen. Trouble is, people seem to have short memories. We have instant communications and information right in front of us(computer) and never research any of these people. If people did, they would not be so hot on putting criminals in office.
2007-07-11 11:48:46 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Only the Bush part scares me. The Clinton part has been just okay so far. We will see the last 8 years of the Clintons and how that goes.
2007-07-11 11:54:08 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
Worse, what is Hillary Clinton was pres for 4 years, then Jeb Bush won after that, then we are getting into 32 years. LOL.
2007-07-11 11:36:45 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 2⤋
Yes, Hillary will be President.
(anyone who really tries to stop her, will end up like vince foster.)
After Hillary's 8 years, it will the Chelsea's turn.
Her real father is Janet Reno.
Note* Our Economy is now the Greatest in History.
Anyone who wants a job, has a job.
People who say the economy was better under Clinton, DON'T WORK THEMSELVES.
They've never had a job.
2007-07-11 11:39:33 · answer #6 · answered by wolf 6 · 2⤊ 1⤋
actually. the U. S. public has seen the effects of one area of a dynasty. Why ask for a 2d around. One ought to declare, besides the undeniable fact that, that Clinton #a million, probable enjoyed himself greater advantageous than #2 could and a minimum of he dod no longer lay plans to salary international conflict 3 or obliterate civil rights.
2016-10-20 21:50:06 · answer #7 · answered by rajkumar 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
yes - it's sickening, and we should never allow this sort of thing to happen. i have been trying to tell people for years that what we ought to do is have a kind of 'draft' for political appointments. that is we would all have a possibility of serving locally, and these local political groups would select someone to represent the next highest level - and so on. it would be random like a draft, or jury duty, and wages would be guaranteed not to be lower than what we are making - and like the 'reserves' our jobs would be held for us. can you imagine the 'walmart' employee - single mother NOT wanting to have a voice.
Peace+
2007-07-11 11:44:42 · answer #8 · answered by Daniel F 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Hmm...When Mr. Clinton was in the White House..Jobs were plenty. The economy was wonderful. We were not at war. Gas prices were down. Oh yea..And we had a paid off national deficit and a balanced budget.
Mr. Bush on the other hand has lost so many jobs, this country will never be right again.
The answer here is we would LOVE to see 36 years of Clinton and ZERO years of Bush.
2007-07-11 11:37:39 · answer #9 · answered by colostomybag4fun1 2 · 0⤊ 5⤋
Anytime anyone says clinton and whitehouse together it scares the hell out of me. I really don't want anymore of bush either. Just give me a real conservative and I will be happy.
2007-07-11 11:39:19 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 1⤋
I'm growing VERY weary of even hearing the names Bush and Clinton. It's time for a change.
2007-07-11 11:37:18 · answer #11 · answered by Anonymous · 5⤊ 1⤋