English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

3 answers

There'd be less utility usage, but I'd get cabin fever.

-MM

2007-07-11 11:12:12 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

Don't really understand the question. Sure, smaller would fit with people who 'want to downsize'. And yes - a smaller place would (likely) have less an impact on the environment. What are you trying to ask?

2007-07-11 18:44:13 · answer #2 · answered by Makakio 3 · 0 0

We already have them. They are called "Apartments."

2007-07-11 18:08:05 · answer #3 · answered by Ranto 7 · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers