http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20070711/ap_on_go_co/fired_prosecutors
Are they going to try the old "national security" ploy on this one?
2007-07-11 09:57:52 · 5 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Law & Ethics
You're kind of stupid, aren't you, only p?
This has nothing to do with "libs" OR loyalty. It's about ignoring a subpoena. It's about attempting to place oneself above the law.
What the fock is a "lib", anyway?
2007-07-11 10:03:26 · update #1
davidmi, is a little stupid, as well. If they've done nothing wrong they have nothing to hide.
Citizens no longer enjoy any type of priviledge, why should our public servants?
George Bush IS a PUBLIC SERVANT.
2007-07-11 10:06:11 · update #2
only p, an MBA is not an "accomplishment". You jumped through a few hoops and got one of the easier degrees in higher education.
By the way, I'm sure that the faculty at U of F would like to see you place a question mark at the end of a question.
I don't roll over, only p. I DON'T roll over.
2007-07-11 11:07:11 · update #3
I love it. When we complain about warrant-less eavesdropping they use that line on us. Well observed.
This gang is guiltier than hell and they are going to go down, you watch. Even the corporate snakes who put them in are made nervous by their weasily ways.
No one really knows which side Cheney and his gang are on. Just be certain, it isn't America's.
2007-07-11 10:01:56 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
Do you libs know what principle is? What about loyalty?
MBA from the University of Florida, what have you accomplished? Hurling insults only exposes the level of ignorance you possess.
Happy. I don't roll over either. An MBA is an accomplishment. Especially at one of the highest ranked public business schools in the nation.
2007-07-11 17:00:55 · answer #2 · answered by only p 6 · 1⤊ 1⤋
Not likely. They are going to hold that conversations between the president and much of his staff are protected by executive privilege.
Private citizens enjoy client attorney privilege. Executive privilege is very similar. You should also note, this does not only exist at the federal level.
The whole "they have nothing to hide" part doesn't matter. I can use my constitutional protections against search and seizure and against making statements regardless if I have "nothing to hide".
2007-07-11 17:01:58 · answer #3 · answered by davidmi711 7 · 0⤊ 1⤋
That still doesn't give the government right to peak into our private lives. I don't like living in police states.
2007-07-11 17:01:20 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
yep your right
2007-07-11 17:13:35 · answer #5 · answered by plhudson01 6 · 0⤊ 1⤋