English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

3 answers

The Palm Treo sucks ... You will lose 1-2 bars of signal strength, compared to a regular phone (I had a 700wx, and would have 5-6 dropped calls per day). Don't know about the Moto Q, but since it's a PDA, it may have the same problem.

2007-07-12 16:09:19 · answer #1 · answered by jdkilp 7 · 1 0

do no longer purchase a Moto Q. residing abode abode windows cellular 6.0 is a foul utility interface which you will hate. The Centro OS is so-so. as quickly as you're needing a telephone purely for advice superhighway purposes alongside with each of different interesting Verizon stuff, like cellular television and VCast ect, the Voyager must be suited, employing certainty it has an entire HTML browser (so it easily feels like the cyber web, on an identical time as on a palm or a Q its purely a .wap formatted.) and you haven't any longer have been given the acquisition any information courses (diverse than Vcast) to exploit all this is nice aspects. in case you easily ought to have a PDA or telephone, look into the Samsung i760 or the Blackberry Curve. Out of the telephones you reported, even although if, i ought to pass with the LG 10,000 Voyager.

2016-10-20 21:27:58 · answer #2 · answered by ? 4 · 0 0

Workign for a cell phone company I hear alot about both phones. I hear both phones really suck and have alot of problems. Both have chronic glitches and have alot of repairs that need to be done to them. Instead get a Research in Motion Blackberry. They are about the same amount you'll spend on a Treo and have barely any problems and run off their own OS which again has barely any problems.

2007-07-11 09:44:46 · answer #3 · answered by TheAsianPlagueFR 3 · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers