English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

Exactly what impeachable offense has he committed? What proof is there?

2007-07-11 09:07:25 · 15 answers · asked by barry c 4 in Politics & Government Government

15 answers

They have nothing and it pisses them off in a huge way. The big time Dem's can yell and scream all they want, but the President has done nothing wrong and there is no proof of any wrong doing.

2007-07-11 09:40:04 · answer #1 · answered by Amanda K 4 · 1 1

While they do have some solid ground on which to bring up charges, such as lying about the WMDs in Iraq or his manipulation of what the Constitution says, but it is unlikely that he will actually be impeached. Most people just want to bring up impeachment to show that they really are against him and they want to use impeachment to show how angry they are with what he's done. Personally, I think that we should start the impeachment process. We really need to send him a message that we are mad as hell and we're not going to take it anymore. Also the impeachment will tie him up for the remainder of his presidency so he won't be able to make any more god awful decisions.

2007-07-11 09:16:08 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 3 2

nicely--you improve a stable element. inspite of the undeniable fact that, there is yet otherwise of finding at this (and, BTW, i don't want impeachment, even inspite of the undeniable fact that i think of Bush and Cheney the two deserve it). First--dissimilar human beings are venting--and in case you will spend time on Y/A politics or any comparable communicate board, extra useful get used to it! :) extra to the element--do not assume it could harm the Democrats politically. Polls teach 40 5% of the yank human beings do want impeaching Bush--the discern for Cheney is even greater. 2 issues could could desire to take place, inspite of the undeniable fact that. First, there could could desire to be some incredibly clean-decrease journey-say, a right away link between warrentless spying on individuals that traced directly to Bush. this is solely possible. yet you may additionally could desire to have a extra or much less complete collabse of the republican coalition interior the Senate--and mutually as that coalition is going to furnish way faster or later on the Iraq concern, i don't see it transforming into so extensive that a 2/3 vote could desire to be carried out--and it could be pointless to question and not applying a raffle of conviction. you apart from mght stated that "the Democrats have supported each and every thing Bush has executed at one time or yet another." Sorry--it incredibly is only faulty--and that they have got on no account supported the knds of strikes Bush has taken that element to possible impeacheable offenses--e.g. using warrentless/no-court docket reviewed surveillance).

2017-01-02 04:10:52 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

He got elected over the two democratic candidates Gore and Kerry to democrats that is impeachable since they are the all knowing and powerful. They just do not get it that if there would be impeachable offense this left wing monstrosity that we call congress would have already launched hearings. The left bloggers that call for impeachment can't even read the words of the Constitution let alone know what you need to prove an impeachable offense.

2007-07-11 09:13:40 · answer #4 · answered by ALASPADA 6 · 1 3

According to the Constitution, lying is not an impeachable offense.

2007-07-11 09:35:10 · answer #5 · answered by Mathsorcerer 7 · 1 1

The last thing I would want to do is impeach President Bush. That would put Dick Cheney in charge of the country.

Oh, wait. He already is. Never mind ...

2007-07-11 09:12:04 · answer #6 · answered by Paul in San Diego 7 · 6 1

Stay tuned as Congress creeps towards impeachment using the Constitutional process.

He has lied from day one about the war, the firing of the attorneys, lied to protect Alberto Gonzalez, lied to protect Cheney, Rummie, Rove and the rest of his thugs. He refuses to be accountable to Congress - which is WE, THE PEOPLE about his actions and plotting leading up to the invasion of Iraq.

He is still lying and hiding things from Congress by claiming "Executive Privilege" where it has no place.

He and his cronies are criminals......and they have destroyed our Justice system, our faith in ourselves, our economy - and the country of Iraq.

He will get his. Our impeachment process is slow, but steady and will reach it's end with his impeachment.

2007-07-11 09:16:46 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 2 2

Incompetence? Proof: Look at our standing in the world; our debt; our demoralized military. The three major duties of president (foriegn policy, the budget and military) and he has failed as badly as is humanly possible at all three.

P.S. For those of you who claim that others do not know the constitution, your man (using the term loosely) G. Dumbya is the one who said "Stop throwing the Constitution in my face,” Bush screamed back. “It’s just a goddamned piece of paper"

2007-07-11 09:12:41 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 3 1

It's pretty clear that he lied to get us into the war in Iraq. He violated the law by spying on thousands of Americans without warrants. He violated US laws and international treaties by holding people without charges or access to lawyers, by kidnapping people from foreign countries, and by torturing prisoners. He clearly authorized the release of classsified information for political purposes in the Valerie Plame case. If he was so sure that he had done nothing illegal, why is he trying so hard to keep his aides from testfying?

2007-07-11 09:16:31 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 2 2

Terminal stupidity? There's lots of proof for that. Except if convicted we'd get the head draft dodger (AKA Dick C.) so scratch that idea.

2007-07-11 09:12:54 · answer #10 · answered by madjer21755 5 · 1 1

fedest.com, questions and answers