Because too many people are born disabled,mutated,diseased or just plain old stupid.They mere existance drains our planets precious resources
2007-07-11 08:12:41 · 24 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
Apparently Margaret Singer, the founder of Planned Parenthood thinks so. Not to mention prominent abortionists like Carhart and Edward Allred.
2007-07-11 14:14:50 · answer #1 · answered by justiceforall234 2 · 1⤊ 0⤋
because of the fact there are 2 possibilities interior the full abortion concern. a pregnant lady can want to have an abortion or to not have one. If somebody helps the alternative the two way, and the mum chooses to have the newborn, does that make the persons helping her professional-existence now? professional-abortion provides in straightforward terms one. there isn't any such component as professional-abortion. this is a slander buzz word made with the aid of suitable-wingers to sensationalize their perspectives like commonplace.
2017-01-02 04:08:16 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Well, you're one of the first pro-abortion people I've met who isn't pro-choice. If you think it should be mandatory for some, then there is no choice.
That said: OF COURSE NOT! Would you have preferred Dr. Steven Hawkins or Helen Keller to be aborted? It is despicable to judge someone as unworthy to live only because they are in some way disabled.
2007-07-11 08:24:57 · answer #3 · answered by The Red Inkstone 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
It sounds to me that you are saying that whoever is not bright or anyone born with a disability should be disposed of? How awful of you to suggest such a thing!
We all have disabilities of one kind or another, the difference is that some show while most are hidden within us...
"Plain old stupid" should be disposed of? What happened with you? Try spell check too!
2007-07-11 08:18:57 · answer #4 · answered by Nick's Mom 3 · 1⤊ 0⤋
I don't believe that any of God's creations should be eliminated. Maybe they are put on this earth to make us appreciate what we have. Didn't Hitler try things like this already? This is human life regardless of how worthless you or I view it. These people also live in places that provide many people with jobs so the road goes both ways.
2007-07-11 15:43:40 · answer #5 · answered by bfldmom3 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Thats exactly where secularism is going to lead us.
No, all humans have a fundamental right to life and are not property of another.
2007-07-11 08:30:23 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Obviously such a statute would be unethican and unconstitutional. Encouraging the 'right' people to seek birth control and abortion is as far as you can take it.
2007-07-11 08:17:28 · answer #7 · answered by B.Kevorkian 7 · 0⤊ 1⤋
NO!
Sounds like the agenda of the fascists during the 1930s and 1940s.
2007-07-11 08:15:56 · answer #8 · answered by The Stylish One 7 · 3⤊ 2⤋
some people here have children who are disabled, mutated, or diseased so why would you want to hurt their feelings by posting this garbage. I hope your kid doesn't end up with the inflictions you listed, you don't appear man enough to handle such a situation.
2007-07-11 08:18:19 · answer #9 · answered by bbbbriggs04 3 · 3⤊ 3⤋
No. The woman's choice it must be - and they have the right to make the wrong choice.
2007-07-11 08:21:00 · answer #10 · answered by Citizen Justin 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋