English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

but avoid the second one like the plague?

Is it because on the first one they were proud to call themselves "state-rights" Republicans, but the second one reminded everybody that previously it was the racist conservative Southern Dixiecrat Party who were for "state-rights"?

The northeastern RADICAL / PROGRESSIVE / LIBERAL Republican Party of Lincoln, Theodore Roosevelt, and Nelson Rockefeller, on the other hand, used the power of the FEDERAL GOVERNMENT to free the slaves, protect the environment, break up monopolies, regulate big business, help the American worker, and give equal rights to minorities.

It kind of blows their "we're still the Party of Lincoln eventhough we fly the confederate flag and most of our leadership comes from the South" idea out of the water doesn't it?

2007-07-11 07:23:51 · 8 answers · asked by trovalta_stinks_2 3 in Politics & Government Politics

Is the Republican Party for state-rights or centralized federal power?
http://answers.yahoo.com/question/index;_ylt=Ale3mzFCt_Z5JRfrlmgOC.3sy6IX?qid=20070711095708AAE2aIu

When did the Republican Party offically become the "state-rights" party?
http://answers.yahoo.com/question/index;_ylt=Ai6QgHxA8q8YH9y9ncDsZr_sy6IX?qid=20070711101516AA33x9P

2007-07-11 07:23:59 · update #1

I live,

Nelson Rockefeller was a liberal Republican from New York.

2007-07-11 07:30:34 · update #2

southernly,

You did not answer the 2nd question because you know it makes cons look bad. I purposely thought of asking these two questions one after the other.

I wanted cons to admit they were state-rights which they promptly did and then ask them how can they be for state rights and claim to be the party of Lincoln and Theodore Roosevelt and Nelson Rockefeller when obviously these guys were not.

2007-07-11 09:14:12 · update #3

8 answers

Check out your original question. I had no problem responding to it and was open and honest about it.

2007-07-11 07:44:12 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

would desire to be mississippi in accordance to chart IQ and Voter determination State customary IQ 2004 a million Connecticut 113 Kerry 2 Massachusetts 111 Kerry 3 New Jersey 111 Kerry 4 ny 109 Kerry 5 Rhode Island 107 Kerry 6 Hawaii 106 Kerry 7 Maryland a hundred and five Kerry 8 New Hampshire a hundred and five Kerry 9 Illinois 104 Kerry 10 Delaware 103 Kerry 11 Minnesota 102 Kerry 12 Vermont 102 Kerry 13 Washington 102 Kerry 14 California one 0 one Kerry 15 Pennsylvania one 0 one Kerry sixteen Maine one hundred Kerry 17 Virginia one hundred Bush 18 Wisconsin one hundred Kerry 19 Colorado ninety 9 Bush 20 Iowa ninety 9 Bush 21 Michigan ninety 9 Kerry 22 Nevada ninety 9 Bush 23 Ohio ninety 9 Bush 24 Oregon ninety 9 Kerry 25 Alaska ninety 8 Bush 26 Florida ninety 8 Bush 27 Missouri ninety 8 Bush 28 Kansas ninety six Bush 29 Nebraska ninety 5 Bush 30 Arizona ninety 4 Bush 31 Indiana ninety 4 Bush 32 Tennessee ninety 4 Bush 33 North Carolina ninety 3 Bush 34 West Virginia ninety 3 Bush 35 Arkansas ninety two Bush 36 Georgia ninety two Bush 37 Kentucky ninety two Bush 38 New Mexico ninety two Bush 39 North Dakota ninety two Bush 40 Texas ninety two Bush 40-one Alabama ninety Bush 40 two Louisiana ninety Bush 40 3 Montana ninety Bush 40 4 Oklahoma ninety Bush 40 5 South Dakota ninety Bush 40 six South Carolina 89 Bush 40 seven Wyoming 89 Bush 40 8 Idaho 87 Bush 40 9 Utah 87 Bush 50 Mississippi eighty 5 Bush

2016-11-09 00:57:44 · answer #2 · answered by piazza 4 · 0 0

The republican party is quickly becoming obsolete. I mean, they filibuster an amendment that would give the troops more rest??!! Really? You really want to do that?

Pubes say that they want less government control and more local control but they are more backwards than the democrats of the 1980's and quite honestly, I'd love to see the Republican party go away.

Bunch of ignorant, racist, redneck chickenhawks.

2007-07-11 07:32:48 · answer #3 · answered by CpprJnk 2 · 1 1

The Republicans are for big business. The GOP was formed by big business to rally against a growing working class making demands. They still have a superior attitude and look at workers as a necessary evil.

2007-07-11 07:29:22 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0 2

"rockefeller" and "helping people" don't belong together in the same sentence, the same way "bush" and "intelligence" don't go together in a sentence.

THEY ARE ALL FOR CENTRALIZED POWER. THEY WANT TO TAKE OVER THE WORLD. They are control freaks. both of the parties, its like they are subsidaries of the same corporation (and they probably are).

2007-07-11 07:27:34 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 2 2

Only Gods view is important. And currently that view is only modeled in conservatism.

2007-07-11 07:50:49 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

i am not interested in how others might have answered your questions, but if you are for taking the power and personal responsibility away from the feds and giving it back to the individual, welcome to the republican party.

2007-07-11 07:33:24 · answer #7 · answered by karl k 6 · 1 1

beats me I never saw either question. But I could answer them. I know you love it when I do.

2007-07-11 07:30:14 · answer #8 · answered by sociald 7 · 1 0

fedest.com, questions and answers