Was 9/11 an inside job?

Question

If not, then why don't they do a new investigation through an independent panel of experts and professional before all the evidense is gone or destroyed?

If it isn't an inside job, then what is there to be scared of.

The intel and reports are not of any top secret value. We already know these so-called terrorists made it through airport screening and hijacked planes with box cutters, so what is there to hide.

The Pentagon is the most secure building in America and must have hundreds of exterior and interior cams, so we should be able to look at the footage from the cams and see a plane hitting. We could also look at the tapes the Secret Service took from the Bank and the Quick Mart across the highway that would have caught the images of the plane coming in.

What I am saying is that there is so much evidense from that day that we could end this and find out the TRUTH once and for all.

Why don't we just have a new investigation so we can all move on?

We are wasting hundreds of billion of tax dollars in Iraq and you are concerned about the cost of a new investigation to the worst attack America has ever seen?

As a citizen you should care about our Nation and the truth from that day. There have been proven contradictions that have debunked the Popular Mechanics debunking campaign.

So with so many people and groups claiming it was an inside job, wouldn't you just want to solve it and be able to shove it in their faces that they were wrong and anti-American in their thinking.

If anything, you would think our Government would want to shut them up since it is the root for at least 70% of the dissent in the Country.

Answer 1

Yes it was. Bush himself didn't plan it (he doesn't have two brain cells to rub together for that), but it was a government created attack.

But they will never have an independent investigation so those who know will know and those that don't, will continue taking Bush's words are God speaking himself. In many eyes, he IS God and everything he says is golden and everyone else who DARES to question our government and hold them accountable is crazy. Go figure, I thought this was a democracy!

Answer 2

I personally believe it was an inside job. Unlike all the people here that soundly dismiss that possibility with hand waving BS, I actually have some substance to prove that I think there was foul play involved. At the very least, it was utter and complete incompetence. And the fact no one lost their job over this most serious breach of US security of our generation boggles the mind. Very telling to anyone with a lick of common sense.

a) fires don't melt steel framed buildings. even if the jet fuel stipped off the fire protection, it still was not nearly enough fuel to sustain a fire heat sink needed to compromise the integrity of the steel beams in those towers. If the planes had brought them down, they would have fallen completely.

b) building 7 collapsed after sustaining no damage. another steel framed building that fell at free fall speed, like the twin towers. in order for buildings to fall at free fall speed, it has to be a demolition job. if it fell due to intense heat, it would have been much, much slower, and much, much messier (on it's side, etc.)

c) Giuliani commissioned the removal of all the debris before FEMA could even get in to look at it. Good thing they found the perfectly unscathed passport of Satam Al Suqami seven blocks from ground zero to seal the setup.

please note bush tried for months to supress an investigation into 9/11, on top of the "My Pet Goat' debacle.

i could go on and on. i think any third grader can get the point. and hopefully, one day, the truth will be known within it's full scope. i doubt it will, however.

*** to the person who saw the '747' hit the pentagon, where are the videos of that happening? why haven't they been released to once-and-for-all silence conspiracy theories?***

Answer 3

No.

It's actually impossible to disprove a conspiracy theory. For instance, say the Pentagon did accept the relative small security compromise implicit in releasing any pictures it may have from external cameras (sure, showing the angles might allow someone to better plan an assault on the building, but how likely is that, and, you can just re-do the camera placement before releasing the photos anyway). Say those pictures clearly show the passenger jet diving towards the building. The 'truthers' will ask "why did it take so long? could it possibly be because they needed the time to /fake/ the pictures!? Look! I found an anomally in one corner of one picutre, isn't that evidence something's wrong here?"

Answer 4

No matter how many times it is investigated, nuts like you will always dismiss the true evidence. So, when nobody with a functioning brain thinks it was an inside job, why would we pour more money in an effort to convince you and Rosie O'Donnell.

I will give you two pieces of simply evidence that the Rosie's of the world are nuts.

1. Rosie says "never before has steel been melted by fire." STEEL IS ALWAYS MELTED BY FIRE!

2. For the WTC 7 to have been brought down by demolition, as well as the entire thing to have been an inside job, the sheer number of people who would have had to have been involved would eliminate the possibility because at least one of them would have come forth with evidence by now in a thirst for their 15 minutes of fame, SOMEONE would have kep evidence. There is NO WAY that that many people would have kept their mouth shut for nearly 6 years. Think about that for a minute!

Answer 5

It was investigated by the closest thing you can get to an independent panel these days. People who still believe that the dumbest president in US history could plan 9/11 in 8 months, then couldn't plant WMDs in the desert in 5 years, won't be convinced it wasn't a conspiracy no matter how many times we investigate it. So why bother. just continue to ignore the facts, and keep listening to the comic book guy. So long as you get your opinions from the shut in bloggers who spew their uneducated opinions between Internet porn wanking sessions, your beyond help.

Answer 6

I agree with you. Ignore the people here who have to resort to name calling due to the fact that they have no arguement. They are probably the ones who voted for Bush in the first place. There are too many unanswered questions and we will probably never know the real truth. Follow your gut on this one & continue your research.Take a look at the link below.Just a bit more reading for you:)

Answer 7

A secret kept by more than one person will not be a secret for long. of course not.

I saw the plane hit the Pentagon in person. Move on.

Answer 8

No, I don't think so.

The only degree to which it was in any way an "inside job" was that someone had to sneak the box cutters onto the airplanes so that the terrorists could use them as weapons: an airport employee, perhaps? But that does not add up to an "inside job" of the magnitude that you suggest.

Answer 9

How much should we shell out to get you to understand that it wasn't an inside job. We can talk until we are blue in the face and you still won't believe it. I'm cool with the results and we've paid enough.

Answer 10

Yay! And clear up Princess Diana's murder and the Roswell Incident while we're about it! ANd how the masons run the world!

Then we'll ALL be HAPPY ever AFTER!