2007-07-11 05:06:29 · 9 answers · asked by Anonymous in Entertainment & Music ➔ Celebrities
Well, there is no way to prove that either way. Those kind of records were not kept. You also cannot go by the drawings left behind, because they were symbolic - not necesarily factual. They showed her topless because of the personna that she wanted portrayed that she was a "king." Similar to the fact that she was not of royal birth, so she made up the "divine birth" story (as did other kings) to get around the common birth problem.
2007-07-11 05:13:44 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
it is legal in Ontario, Canada. Has been for roughly 10 years now. no longer many females people flow topless however...basically as a results of fact women people can, does not recommend that society is waiting for it. yet definite, i've got considered adult adult males with extra beneficial breasts than some women people. we are used to it. we are no longer used to females people going topless in North u.s.. it is going to take a psychological/social replace till now any legal replace would have an impact.
2016-11-09 00:36:01 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Being bare chested wasn't that big a deal back then, so I'm not surprised.
2007-07-11 05:10:05 · answer #3 · answered by David 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
No, I did not know that. I that you for the information.
2007-07-11 05:10:22 · answer #4 · answered by Tony M 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Eww. Sag!!?
2007-07-11 05:08:45 · answer #5 · answered by K C M J 3 · 1⤊ 0⤋
lol...i'm sure the guys around didn't mind
2007-07-11 05:09:03 · answer #6 · answered by mara 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
nope
2007-07-11 10:02:01 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
no i did not
2007-07-11 05:08:45 · answer #8 · answered by PSU840 6 · 1⤊ 0⤋
no i didnt know that...
2007-07-11 05:13:56 · answer #9 · answered by spoof ♫♪ 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋