I asked a question about whether to use a plastic or wood paint brush. The answers I got left me laughing. No intelligence just mimmicked rhetoric from the available propaganda. These "greenies" can't even decide between themsilves which is better to use without spouting some "green" prophecy instead of scientific facts. Kind of like the christians do.
2007-07-11 04:47:33 · 6 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Other - Politics & Government
To be honest, regarding the paint brush, I figured an airless paint sprayer is greener than a plastic or wood paint brush.
2007-07-11 04:55:15 · update #1
Well, you've totally discredited environmentalism. I think I'll go pollute now.
2007-07-11 04:51:31 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 4⤊ 0⤋
Because environmentalists live in the real world, not the fairy land of candy dust and rainbow unicorns where there is a little voice coming out of the radio telling them what to think, feel and say.
Paper has advantages, plastic has advantages.
Paper has drawbacks, plastic has drawbacks.
Why does your breed find it impossible to comprehend that life is not black and white? That most issues are complicated and each individual must weigh facts and research to decide what is the best, most responsible path for them to take?
Why do you need someone to "tell you what to do?"
Why can't you research the empiral data (it's not propaganda, babe) and make the choice yourself?
***************************
Actually, most people I know have their own big cloth bags, that they use over and over. So your "question" is bogus, anyway.
2007-07-11 04:55:49 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 2⤋
When it comes to a paint brush both use equal amount of petroleum to produce so there is no 'green' answer. If you want to be green reuse and borrow so there is no petroleum used in production.
2007-07-11 04:51:57 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 1⤋
Yeah. Everyone else is in agreement on everything, so those "greenies" must be pretty stupid. Almost as stupid as someone who makes such a fallacious argument as "if someone can't agree on one simple thing, then they must not be able to agree on anything."
2007-07-11 04:55:40 · answer #4 · answered by Mr. Taco 7 · 1⤊ 1⤋
agreed. cannot use paper because we need the trees, and now plastic water bottles are bad for the environment because it ensures our dependence on oil.
Furthermore, they preach that we SHOULDNT be using them, not recycle.
2007-07-11 04:57:13 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 2⤋
So, your asking a question now?
2007-07-11 04:51:15 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋