why not both. if one has the talent, then the world is your oyster :D
2007-07-11 04:02:24
·
answer #1
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
I would be an Actor - singers need to have a ridiculous tour schedule in order to stay in the limelight while their style of music is "in", so there's no life outside the music. And once the shift is made to a new genre, very few can make the change as well. (Think Disco or Grunge) Actors at least can take time off and still recover their careers, b/c the way people "act" really never changes.
2007-07-11 04:07:33
·
answer #2
·
answered by StereoZ 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
Singer
2007-07-11 04:03:59
·
answer #3
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Actor
2007-07-11 04:02:01
·
answer #4
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
An actor
2007-07-11 04:04:20
·
answer #5
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Actor.
2007-07-11 04:01:23
·
answer #6
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Actor~
Then I can star along side some hottie actors as well. Hard to do that when you are a singer I think....
2007-07-11 04:01:46
·
answer #7
·
answered by Brownie 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
If those are my choices, an actor. Singers usually have short careers.
2007-07-11 04:03:57
·
answer #8
·
answered by Truth is elusive 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
actor i'm a bad singer
2007-07-11 04:04:22
·
answer #9
·
answered by niki 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
Definitely a singer!
2007-07-11 04:02:30
·
answer #10
·
answered by drlauraittd01 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
Singer. I have a lovely voice
2007-07-11 04:01:46
·
answer #11
·
answered by Big Richard 3
·
0⤊
0⤋