If Bush was able and willing to run for President in 08', would you vote for him?
2007-07-11 03:14:14 · 25 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Elections
If he was able I would cast my vote for Hillary Clinton instead.
You have to admit with his low approval ratings, he is still better than Guiliani, and Romney
2007-07-11 03:16:39 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 11⤋
I'm a republican, I support Bush but with his popularity doing so poorly, I think voting him in '08 is useless. He doesn't have a "mandate" he can claim or public support for his policies so all he could do is battle the Democratic Congress. No real progress there....
2007-07-11 10:28:06 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋
This is classic. And it would depend entirely on who he is running against. What if the person he's running against it a worse rube than he is? What if the person he's running against can't/won't tell you what they're about other than to say that they aren't Bush.
Bush is a known quantity. I know what he's going to do. No suprises. I don't agree with all of it by any means, but I know where he stands and what he stands for.
2007-07-11 10:23:28 · answer #3 · answered by bmattj121 4 · 4⤊ 0⤋
The only reason I voted for him twice is The Democrats had much worse candidates.
I wish we could have a conservative running for office. Bush is in no way a conservative. He has never been one and never tied to be one.
2007-07-11 10:30:32 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋
Neither the Republicans or Democrats will get my vote. I am sick and tired of the 2 party system in this country. It's time for change in this country. Vote 3rd party!
2007-07-11 10:30:01 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋
While I like how he is dealing with a few things, I do not think he is doing enough for the war on terror, or how he is dealing with illegal immigrants.
Yet I would love to see how he debated some of the Republicans in the primaries. He may still be the best person for the job.
2007-07-11 10:33:57 · answer #6 · answered by heThatDoesNotWantToBeNamed 5 · 3⤊ 1⤋
I guess it depends, I would have to know more about some of the candidates that are currently running.
I would definitely consider voting for him again, if that was the scenario.
low Un-employment rate
Defends the country
No Child Left behind is working
building economy (more jobs created)
So possibly I would but even it it were real I couldn't give a definitive answer this early.
2007-07-11 10:19:53 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 6⤊ 2⤋
Well I'd vote for Ron Paul in the primaries but if Bush won the nomination then yes I would vote for him. I realise he may not be the best but he sure beats anything the demoncrats have to offer.
2007-07-11 10:25:06 · answer #8 · answered by Nianque 4 · 3⤊ 2⤋
If I couldn't vote for McCain or Paul, then I guess, but I'm too young to vote anyways....as long as Hilary stays OUT of the oval office, I'll be okay I guess.
2007-07-11 10:22:28 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 6⤊ 1⤋
Probably not. But It would depend on who else was running. Make the field of canidates bad enough and I would have to basically vote for the lesser of evils.
2007-07-11 10:20:26 · answer #10 · answered by sparky_coffee 3 · 2⤊ 2⤋
The situations remains the same as it was in the last election. He's a bad candidate who just happens to be better than who the Democrats have running.
2007-07-11 10:40:55 · answer #11 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 2⤋