Clinton mastermind the first WTC attack, bombing of the USS Cole, bombing of the embassies, etc....Doesn't the fact that he would not take Osama Bin Lauden into custody point to the fact that he was part of a sleeper cell??
2007-07-11 01:28:30 · 21 answers · asked by Cyber Stalker III 3 in Politics & Government ➔ Government
Now he's trying to unleash a Weapon of Mass Destruction on the US, his wife Hillary.
2007-07-11 01:32:04 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 4⤊ 1⤋
Don't forget that Clinton must have masterminded the Oklahoma City bombing and the downing of Flight TWA 800, too!
I'm sorry, but it takes too much mental shutdown and madness to believe such malarky. Considering the plan was hatched and the first of the 9/11 terrorists had come to the US prior to Bush even winning the GOP nomination, let alone the presidency, which was a very close thing, how and why would Bush have masterminded it?
And considering that Bush had been settling down nicely into the presidency to deal with domestic issues, such as tax rate reductions to get us out of the Clinton recession, there is absolutely no logical or rational reason he'd have wanted something like 9/11 to happen.
"Truthers" need help - they obviously have a problem dealing with reality.
2007-07-11 01:40:03 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
9/11 befell in no small area because of the fact the Bush administration decreased the anti-terrorism attempt (inspite of pleas by the outgoing Clinton administration) to concentration on famous person Wars and newborn pornography. there grow to be *no* assembly of Bush administration anti-terrorism leaders until August 2001, examine Richard Clarke's e book, "against All Enemies." Clinton sent dozens of cruise missiles into Afghanistan after Kenya/Tanzania and bombed production unit. it particularly is not any longer treating terrorism like against the regulation. Get your info immediately until now you ask a self-serving greatest question.
2016-12-10 08:46:19 · answer #3 · answered by ? 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
The Clintons are devout Communists and should be hung for treason and Bush a mastermind when the liberal press thinks he's a dummy? Can't be both ways well it can if you're a democommunist
2007-07-11 01:40:57 · answer #4 · answered by ? 3 · 1⤊ 0⤋
WOW !! ............ I`m impressed ! ........... You sure know a lot we ordinary dumb folk aren`t aware of , Jerome .
How did you find all these things out ? Probably through exhaustive research , investigation , collecting evidence , talking to witnesses , bargaining with collaborators , and deductive reasoning . Am I right ?
Why not write a book exposing Bush and Clinton ............ perhaps you could find something on Washington ? Lincoln ? Roosevelt ? Eisenhower ? Reagan ? .
I`ll bet you could prove to us they were all terrorists intent on destroying America .
The boys at the National Enquirer would be green with envy !
2007-07-11 01:47:49 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Trying to make a logical argument to insane people is a waste of time. Only insane people believe Bush had anything to do with 9/11. Sadly, according to the latest polls, that is about 30% of the U.S.
The terrorists won't destroy America, our own mentally retarded citizens will.
2007-07-11 01:38:28 · answer #6 · answered by Aegis of Freedom 7 · 2⤊ 0⤋
I always said Clinton should be tried as an accomplice to Bin Laden because he gave him a free pass.
2007-07-11 01:48:00 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
Attention K Mart shoppers, there is a sale on tinfoil going on now, hat-making lessons begin in 10 minutes!
2007-07-11 01:58:24 · answer #8 · answered by Mark A 6 · 2⤊ 0⤋
There's no arguing with illogic.
Remember the planes that flew out on 9-11?
2007-07-11 01:43:34 · answer #9 · answered by PATRICIA MS 6 · 0⤊ 1⤋
Hee Hee Hee. I hope you are still going to be here tomorrow. Take a pill and dissolve..... before you know it a pile of black hummers will be at your doorstep. Just a thought. Good question though.
2007-07-11 01:40:54 · answer #10 · answered by Rooikat 5 · 1⤊ 0⤋