Are the RESUMES of Hillary & Obama too WEAK?

Question

(Please - I know they qualify under the Constitution to run for President - So does Carrot Top)

Every President that I can remember have had at least ONE of these things on their resume; Most had a combination!!

Military Experiance, CEO of a company, CEO in government like a Mayor or a Governor. Foreign Diplomat Experiance.

Hillary & Obama have NONE of these.

Hillary & Osama are 2 of 100 United States Senators. They have never been in Charge of anything. They are 2 of 100 people serving in the Senate. On top of this, they have only been in the US senate a very short time. They are both JUNIOR senators. They have NEVER been in a leadership position of ANY kind (Mayor, Gov, CEO, Military Officer).

(Bush 2 times elected CEO/Governor of Texas, Ran a Business, Flew Jets in the guard, Harvard MBA, twice elected president of the United States)

Answer 1

very weak.all they have is race and gender.

Biden ,Richardson and Dodd have a better qualification.

Answer 2

Hillary and Obama barely qualify as members of the human race and neither are qualified to become President of the United States.Obama is anti-war, not that this is bad, but how does a person that is anti-war send our troops to defend our country when needed and what happens to our military; The answer to that is easily found by looking at the record or our last anti-war President, Bill Clinton. The military budget was slashed, many of our bases were closed, after the attack on the USS Cole and several of our embassies around the world all that he could say is "Those responsible for these acts will be hunted down and punished". No one was ever hunted down.

Hillary is also anti-war and even joined in with Bill in demonstrations against the Vietnam war, she has but one claim to fame and that is being the former First Lady (and I use that term very loosely) that failed to provide universal health care then and is promoting the exact same health care reform that didn't work then.

Note to Jeremiah, Sorry buddy, you are WRONG a DUI is
a misdemeanor punishable by up to 1 year in jail. It can become a Felony only if there was bodily injury. If it were a Felony then you would be correct, a person that is convicted of a felony can not be President. Had it been decided to formally charge Bill Clinton with perjury and obstruction of justice (bot felonies) he would have been impeached in both the House and Senate and would have been removed from office.

Answer 3

Before we hit it off in animated subjects.... I was allowed, to download, the Presidents Constitution, reflecting on the Job... The Spirit At the Time at least Good Hearted and in sync with Good Nature ...
Lawfully candidate, is the issue at stake here. ... My Back bench and Monitor, scientist and fellow researcher, miracles assures me, that put into words of Democratic consensus in act of Creation Democratic Consensus if it wants to be as Law full as it is written..... Perhaps only Senator Mac Cain has full filled the Meaning of the Law on Candidacy.... I figure that to be a very Gentile gesture, from a Time in Life, where circumstance were less conveniently luxurious, and The Tax Treasure practically left to Slavery in One Colony and Super wealth in the other.

I find Hilary and Obama Warm and Human choices I don´t know what the Curriculum Vitae of a Worthy successor should read..... Some respectables as they assume positions. ....Across the River Styx AL the ferrymen are protected under Strike act..... Consensus is the Meaning.....

We find a candidate the Jester who whispers wittifull Angelic points of View, only to jump to the righteous other shoulder and prod with an spoke or three.... Five where I come from....

I favor Tomato´s and Roses Where I stand.... Food for thought Elections Take 4 years to take four years on no ends of bands....Playing the Anthem

Answer 4

It depends on what they've done in their positions, and whether they've EARNED their qualifications -

Let's look at your Bush comparison -

The governor of Texas is, according to all government experts, about the weakest governor's office in the nation in terms of actual powers and ability to exercise those powers.

Actually, he ran several businesses, and ran them all into the ground.

Every business where he was a CEO was funded by friends of his father, and they all lost his dad's friends a ton of money, which didn't stop them from currying favor by funding the next fiasco. I think it's where he learned his current views on accountability.

Flew jets in the Guard - This was a "Champagne Unit" in the guard that people wanted badly to get in, because it meant avoiding active service in Viet Nam. Again, with his father's influence, he jumped ahead of a lot of people who were waiting to get in. Once in (coincidentally when they started drug testing) he went AWOL and didn't earn points for an honorable discharge. However, the Texas Air Guard "gifted" him points without having to serve or earn them.

Havard MBA - his qualifications would not have earned him admission into Harvard, but his father's connections got him in. Once in, he was a mediocre student. Remember, in grad school, getting Cs is pretty much the bottom of the barrel, especially in Ivy League schools where you get grade inflation due to the caliber of the institutions.

Getting elected as POTUS doesn't count as a qualification to run, because under that criteria, we wait and see if Hillary or Obama get elected, then declare retroactively if they are qualified, based on whether they were elected. So I won't go into the massive election fraud in both elections, or the unprecedented appointing of Bush in the first one by the SCOTUS.

As far as military service goes, that's not a fair requirement because it used to be mandatory to serve - it took no particular courage or ability to get drafted. Since after Viet Nam, we've had an all-volunteer army. If you want to say "leadership position in the military," then fine. Or "served in active combat duty in the military" that's also a different animal.

There are plenty of Presidents who were never governors or CEOs.

Obama's and Hillary's academic credentials are WAY more impressive than Bush's, so if you want to include his Harvard MBA, then you have to include their records as qualified as well.

Answer 5

No they do not have what it takes.
And we on the right do not have any one who have the gohoneys to stand up the DC machine and the media. I voted two time for Bush and he has disappointed me by trying to be friends with the left and being a nice guy. Politics is not a nice job and if you stand for what you believe in than you do so to the end even if it means to the death as our fine young men and women who are serving to protect us. GWB has not secured the boarder and has sold out to Mexico two boarder guards that sit in a jail now and is selling out Dog the bounty hunter to Mexico and the max factor other money. All the while Arab Muslims are taking over by moving in the South American Countries by sending money and helping these poor people while we turn our heads just as the media and the left does on the war. We need to let our men and women win this at all cost or we will all be facing Mecca 5 times a day as slaves or dead. I for one would like to see a new true Conservative party that hold and stands up for what 2/3 of America truly knows to be true. I have been a Republican all of my life and I am sick of the Politicians lies on both sides. In Ohio you have members like Vonovich who held up appointing the one man needed in the UN and now calling for pulling out of Iraq. You have McCain who is a RINO and you have Gulinni who is about choice and guns laws. You tell me what is go about both sides

And http://rds.yahoo.com/_ylt=A0geu813y5RGrf4AsFtXNyoA;_ylu=X3oDMTE2MjFjMmxsBHNlYwNzcgRwb3MDNARjb2xvA2UEdnRpZANGNzU0XzcyBGwDV1Mx/SIG=12ck115m7/EXP=1184242935/**http%3a//www.informationclearinghouse.info/article1665.htm

The PNAC ( Project for the New American Century) Penelope You are not some sweet young Conservative as you appear. To Bad. you come up with such good augments but over look to much of the facts and we on the right do not and the ones who do should not as one thing we have on our side is the truth and when we get in the mud like the left then be are also dirty.

Answer 6

And how is that CEO thing working out? Seems bush and cheney are running the country into the ground, maybe an outsider would be better. Couldn't be worse, it's not possible to reduce something to lees than dust.

Answer 7

hillary is a socialist/commie with a great resume for a revolutionary anarchist.obama is the darling of the libs,that's his only claim to fame.the dems are grasping at straws.more of the same misguided march to socialism!God help us if these clowns get elected in 08!

Answer 8

Lincoln didn’t have any of the experience that you outlined as qualifications and he was one of our greatest presidents.

A candidate has to be judged on his or her ideas, stances on the issues and perceived ability to get the job done. Individuals who may have all or most of the experience that you think necessary can, as we have seen, turn out to be terrible presidents.

Answer 9

But technically, Bush shouldn't have been allowed to run. You can't be President if you've committed a felony.



1970 - Bush's DUI incident. Spent 2 weeks in jail. Under Federal law, that's a felony.

Answer 10

Bush has lowered the bar so much that anyone would look better by comparison. None of the candidates running could do a worse job than Bush.

Answer 11

They're both attorneys. In my eyes that truly disqualifies both of them for the office. It also disqualifies both of them for the offices they currently hold now. Wake Up.


Ron Paul 2008.