Barak Obama's question from FOUR months ago is again featured by Yahoo as a headliner on its roll of featured questions . Included in that post is a disclaimer by Yahoo stating that this is not an endorsement....... oh really . OK , let's test that theory .
How many other users have had their question featured by Yahoo and then had it re-featured FOUR MONTHS LATER , . .. . . . .even though the question was already resolved . . .. . AND to allow you to comment further to the 'community' ?
Anyone ? Even ONE ?
My answer ? . . .. . . Of course not !!
So.. . .What you are witnessing is Yahoo's complete and utter bias towards one particular party and one particular candidate . It's not the fact that they likely lied when his original question was posted , even though that should be scrutinized , but clearly when they alter their format to fit one particular candidate and re-post his question to allow him to speak to the forum again regarding the same question , then that is bias .
2007-07-10 22:52:55 · 17 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
Liberalism is now a secular religion. They believe what they believe and accept what they accept purely on the basis of their zealotry. They are no longer capable of being unbiased. They no longer even consider the possibility that what they believe can be wrong, any more than any other religious zealot.
For instance how many times have you seen someone painstakingly walk them through the events leading up to the Iraq war? Yet, they still sit there and repeat the mantra "Bush lied". Proof has no place in this kind of zealotry.
They believe that they are good and that there way is the right way beyond all reason. Therefore, you get statements like RFK jr's that anyone who even questions the global warming canon is a traitor. A traitor?!!!? A traitor to what? To their blind zealotry, I guess. Certainly no argument can be made that we who question global warming are acting outside of the constitution.
If you accuse such people of bias they think you must be stupid, wrong or now evil. Why? Because you repeatedly commit blasphemy against their secular religion. RFK jr. sounded like part of the Inquisition or some Salem witch trial prosecutor.
.
2007-07-11 00:42:55 · answer #1 · answered by Jacob W 7 · 4⤊ 2⤋
There community guideline enforcements and their not answering any of our questions on the matter of hate emails, reporting, and the like show they are very politically biased. And when will a conservative question ever be posted as a feature, we know never!!
2007-07-11 10:40:14 · answer #2 · answered by ALASPADA 6 · 2⤊ 1⤋
I don't think this is evidence of bias. How do you know he isn't paying them to run the question a second time while the other candidates have yet to do so?
If Barack pays a TV station to run his campaign ad a second time does that mean they are biased in his favor too?
2007-07-10 23:55:26 · answer #3 · answered by BOOM 7 · 1⤊ 1⤋
Ha!!! Look at all of the "Green" questions that they have put up as featured questions and all of the questions on Global Warming that have been featured recently. Yahoo is definitely biased and it isn't even a secret.
2007-07-10 23:14:25 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 5⤊ 2⤋
Anyone who says they don't know that Yahoo is run be a bunch of Hypocritical Political Partisans is either a Fool or a Liar !
2007-07-11 02:22:29 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 1⤋
Yahoo is an independent company; they can do what they want!
They are not a government entity; there is no Establishment of Religion (or political delineation) clause preventing them from endorsing anything from a type of religion to a particular political candidate.
BTW, how much do you pay to YA to be able to post your questions? Money talks...
2007-07-10 23:12:13 · answer #6 · answered by MenifeeManiac 7 · 4⤊ 3⤋
I'm having a hard time even getting my questions put on the board let alone featured.
2007-07-10 22:59:32 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 6⤊ 1⤋
Yahoo contributes almost exclusively to the Republican Party. So, yes, Yahoo could be seen as politically biased.
Not the answer that you expected, is it?
2007-07-11 03:02:05 · answer #8 · answered by ? 4 · 1⤊ 3⤋
The sames ones who say YA is not biased are the same ones who will swear that the major media is conservative.....they are delusional!!
2007-07-11 21:50:57 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 1⤋
At least I don't see Hitlery Clinton's questions so often.
2007-07-10 23:06:25 · answer #10 · answered by Avner Eliyahu R 6 · 5⤊ 1⤋