'Leaving no stone unturned'
I think the McCanns would have a hard time defending this action if it was ever brought against them.
2007-07-10 22:44:43 · 21 answers · asked by dave s 2 in News & Events ➔ Current Events
mark - I have no doubt you are right. So given that the McCanns actions resulted in her death, do you feel they should be punished in a court of law, or do we bypass justice in this case? Shall we pick and choose when justice gets delivered?
2007-07-10 22:49:35 · update #1
Snookler - would you apologize to me if I won?
2007-07-10 22:50:11 · update #2
Welcome back - again.
If they had left "no stone unturned" in the beginning, this whole sorry mess wouldn't have happened.
2007-07-10 22:50:04 · answer #1 · answered by Dogs'r'us 4 · 14⤊ 7⤋
Whoever brought the case would be up against very powerful lawyers but yes the McCanns should have a hard time trying to represent their claims.
2007-07-11 05:24:53 · answer #2 · answered by fizzywo 4 · 1⤊ 0⤋
If you mean in relation to the trades' description act, i's a moot point. Funnily enough I heard the other day that it takes around £4million to engage a top QC to defend a case overseas. I do not know if that includes travelling time.
2007-07-11 00:32:59 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
If they hadn't neglected their children in the first place this wouldn't have happened. Leaving no stone unturned???? With the amount of stones on this planet how come they have time for a luxury holiday with all the trimmings.
2007-07-11 02:01:42 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 2⤋
Happy Murcias post is what interested me most, sorry Dave LOL.
We had speculated on here, that this MAY be the case, so now it appears to be true. Very interesting.
2007-07-10 23:43:59 · answer #5 · answered by babyshambles 5 · 4⤊ 1⤋
I think people would feel happier about the company if they explained a bit more about how they are spending the money. People didnt donate to buy balloons/pay salaries etc they paid into the fund to help find Maddy ie people searching/private detectives something concrete. All we are hearing about is how they are raising even more money and not much searching is going on!
2007-07-10 23:03:36 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 7⤊ 3⤋
No, I don't.
Note to The Happy Murcia: You say you've read that they are barred from leaving Portugal. Isn't it true that you have read that here on Yahoo! Answers? Have you started to treat what you see here as credible? Sad.
2007-07-11 02:15:16 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 4⤊ 2⤋
Have you read the Sol Report yet?
If so, what did you think?
2007-07-11 02:55:55 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
what happens to the money if she isnt found? obviously she isnt going to be. she's a hot potato. and the best way to be rid of a hot potato is to dump it.
2007-07-10 23:21:42 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 4⤊ 2⤋
Why don't you try? Seriously, you must have collected enough data & evidence against them to win, for sure, by now, haven't you? Or is this all conjecture?
Anthony: My take is that money is being used to fund good PIs. Thats the reason why details of this can't be divulged at this stage. It has to be Private, right? or the purpose will get defeated.
2007-07-10 23:09:10 · answer #10 · answered by Faith 6 · 7⤊ 6⤋
Leaving no grub untouched.
2007-07-11 00:42:52 · answer #11 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 2⤋