2007-07-10 18:46:20 · 20 answers · asked by Anonymous in Social Science ➔ Anthropology
They are either bisexual or animals...
2007-07-10 18:50:43 · answer #1 · answered by synxz001 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Depends on if they married because they were in love/attracted to each other, or for some other reason (say to hide that they are gay). I think if they are still attracted to their own sex, they are gay (or bisexual). Marriage is just a legal/religious contract and has little to do with actual sexual attraction.
By the way, several people I know thought they were straight and got married, only later in life did they decide they were gay and get divorced. Does that mean they became gay, or were always gay?
2007-07-11 01:52:18 · answer #2 · answered by paddler_70 2 · 1⤊ 0⤋
This happens more than you would imagine. The naive among us can mind their own business instead of the gay couples' life. And the couple can give all the same things to an adoptive child that a couple that procreates does. I don't know of any vocabulary term for a marriage or partnership that describes a mixed homosexual couple. I think of them as "marrieds". I'm aware of three different households and they seem above normal in financial income.
2007-07-11 01:58:16 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 0⤋
Lesbian girl+ Gay Man + Marry = Bi curious married couple.
2007-07-11 01:50:31 · answer #4 · answered by sweetlee725 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I'd say they'd probably be bisexual although it depends on their actual motivations for marrying. If they feel no actual desire for each other and are just doing it to blend in (and if they are having sex are doing it for the same reason; because they will look less "suspicious" if they have a child) then I suppose they're still gay. Ultimately though I really think such labels are stupid.
2007-07-12 00:17:34 · answer #5 · answered by Somes J 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Yes, they would still be "gay". Some of these unions are done as a marriage of convenience in order to provide mutual "cover" from prying eyes. The best example of this was the marriage of Charles Laughton and Elsa Lancaster in the 1930's.
2007-07-11 20:58:20 · answer #6 · answered by MICHAEL R 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
That's a funny oxymoron Katie... made me laugh. But it is a gay joke right? Well here in Canada it is illegal.
Honestly, it is now illegal in Canada to make jokes about the homosexual community. The politically correct militants had it rammed through the system and installed in the country's laws. I can tell a lot of sex jokes about women...and not suffer a thing for it. But if I asked if you heard about the homosexual midget? Hell....I can be charged! Not that it's going to happen but I think it's sick that "legally it can happen".
Just a piece of trivia for ya. Thanks for the laugh, it was a cunning question.
2007-07-11 03:41:12 · answer #7 · answered by the old dog 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
That is a good question, I never thought about that. I would think that they would not be on the level of the law. However, personally they would be consided a gay couple.
2007-07-11 02:14:32 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Probably more like a gay family after you include his BF and her GF, and whoever else accepts an invitation to join.
2007-07-11 01:49:35 · answer #9 · answered by Willy 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Nop
2007-07-11 09:41:59 · answer #10 · answered by wintersnow 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
The inner childs in them need healing
2007-07-11 01:53:45 · answer #11 · answered by SmartPerson 1 · 0⤊ 0⤋