Since alot of pitchers and hitters were doing steroids prior to 1999 and Bonds wasn't, doesn't that mean we should adjust Bond's stats, including his home run totals, up?
2007-07-10 15:04:32 · 7 answers · asked by Anonymous in Sports ➔ Baseball
yes
2007-07-16 11:41:25 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
No, but you make an interesting point. MLB players
make enough money as it is; too much, it could be
easily agreed.
Players who use steroids should be penalized by
the association that represents them by nullifying a
home run that they'd hit when they were known to be
using steroids. That would be a nice little bit of
"poetic justice"!
If that were done--and, of course, it never will be--
Barry Bonds would be eons away from matching
the record of the great Hank Aaron!
2007-07-10 15:13:33 · answer #2 · answered by Pete K 5 · 1⤊ 0⤋
have confidence me, even although Barry Bonds called Mark Ecko an fool, he could not be wiser. For purely over 3 quarters of a million funds, he have been given much greater exposure and merchandising for his layout label than he might have have been given, had he paid for his merchandising on my own. Plus, he would be remembered for somewhat a while through fact the shopper of the ball. very like Seth McFarlane is remembered for determining to purchase McGuire's single-season checklist residing house run ball.
2016-12-14 05:17:14 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Only if he admits to using steroids and comes clean when he started. Otherwise none of his records should count.
2007-07-10 15:07:29 · answer #4 · answered by Steve C 7 · 1⤊ 1⤋
sorry to burst ur bubble but Bonds is a Steriod abuser
2007-07-10 15:08:25 · answer #5 · answered by K.G. 4 · 0⤊ 1⤋
NO! Everyone elses should be dropped.
2007-07-10 15:07:33 · answer #6 · answered by sakotgrimes 4 · 0⤊ 1⤋
NO!!!!!!!!!
2007-07-10 15:08:03 · answer #7 · answered by matt b 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋