Yeah the Suns would've won, because all of you fuking geniuses know for a fact that they would've won game 5,6,7 and then gone on to sweep the Jazz and the Cleveland Lebrons.
Yeah the Suns were cheated out of every game they played and lost this year. We know they had game 1 stolen from them, even if there is no proof we can just make statements and say it is so. They also had every other game where Amare and Diaw played an LOST stolen from them, because ONCE AGAIN the NBA and STERN just love to have the Spurs in the finals where they have the LOWEST ratings for finals EVER. It makes great financial sense, doesn't it you MORONS.
The Suns can't beat the Spurs in a 5 game series, a 7 game series or a 99 game series. GET OVER IT!! The Spurs won and that's the real fact.
You don't lose game 1 at home Suns fans, and then say you would've won all the other games. The Suns didn't take care of their home court with or without Stoudemire, or Diaw.
I didn't see anyone technical foul out any Suns, Mavs, or Cavs players when they were SITTING ON THE BENCH, I did see that happen to Duncan.
Keep on with the "woulda, coulda, and that's all you'll ever have.
SPURS '07 Champs and will repeat in '08, so deal with it losers
2007-07-10 12:50:12
·
answer #1
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
0⤋
Whatever happened happened. Im a spurs fan, but Im going to be fair. Sure robert horry hip checked nash, but it was the SUNS PLAYERS DECISION to rush out onto the court, and that is a CLEARLY STATED RULE that all of the players in the league are or should be aware of. Its ludacris to blame a series win on one move by a player. The suns players didnt have to rush the court, that was THEIR decision, and it resulted in their loss. Plain and simple. I think its time for Phoenix fans to stop placing blame somewhere else. That was 1 game that the spurs won without those two players, wheres your excuse for the other 3 losses Phoenix?
2007-07-10 13:41:51
·
answer #2
·
answered by Myself 2
·
2⤊
0⤋
In someway it take Nash out of rhythm when Bowen guard him. It's hurt the most when Amare and Diaw didn't played on game 6. It would big different when Amare and Diaw on basketball court.
2007-07-10 12:31:56
·
answer #3
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Probably not, Duncan was very consistent and Parker getting hot, so it might of been a closer series,but San Antonio still would win.Though, in some way, Phoenix may have pulled it out.
2007-07-10 14:03:10
·
answer #4
·
answered by zebbie g 2
·
1⤊
0⤋
They still would have been a 4-time champion. I don't think that effected the series and once they got bye the suns it was an easy road from there
2007-07-10 12:36:17
·
answer #5
·
answered by Red Sox 2
·
1⤊
0⤋
Bowen didnt hip check him Robert Horry did and yes the suns would've won because they almost won without diaw and amare so with them they wouldve won snd then go to phoenix for game 7.
To make a point Amare and diaw shouldn't of been suspended because they didnt fight they just made sure no fight start
2007-07-10 12:21:25
·
answer #6
·
answered by sunsfan14 3
·
0⤊
2⤋
What hip check. You mean the groin. A lil help over here would be nice
2007-07-10 12:01:58
·
answer #7
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
1⤋
actually ,i thought it was horry who hip checked him.but those susp changed the series.without i thought the suns had the advantage.
2007-07-10 12:21:48
·
answer #8
·
answered by mojo569 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
no spurs will not be champions. they suck. spurs is a cheating and a dirty team.
2007-07-11 04:54:55
·
answer #9
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
steve nash is weak i would have tackled his butt
2007-07-10 12:02:43
·
answer #10
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
1⤋