http://www.videovat.com/videos/1947/alte...
Has past all U.S. standard tests,
Is currently developing a military humvee...
But, Should this be the hottest ticket on the environmental issue?
Shows how U.S. politicians really arent out to solve the environmental issue, doesnt it????
Anyone intereste in protecting the environment, AND not for supporting terrorist country's by buying theiroil, should cal their Representatives and have them look into this more!!!
A Car that Is already running on Water!!!
Amazing!!!
This SHOULD BE A PRIORITY for the U.S.!!!!
2007-07-10 11:14:56 · 18 answers · asked by writersbIock2006 5 in Politics & Government ➔ Government
Tax incentives for any car manufacturer out there would cause any one of the leading manufacturers to begin a prototype,
Others would have to follow suit...
Does this prove congress is devoted to the auto industry more than it is to the american public.
2007-07-10 11:16:53 · update #1
then the government will lose the tax base from gas and fuel
2007-07-10 11:18:48 · answer #1 · answered by skcs11 7 · 1⤊ 1⤋
Wow, you posted the car that takes water and turns it into hydrogen and back to water. So in the end you end up with exactly what you started with PLUS a ton of energy. So you "created" energy. The 1st LAW of themodynamics, which NO scientist will tell you has been violated: Energy cannot be created OR destroyed, merely altered in form. I'm not saying it is a consensus. It has never been disproven. EVER. That's why it changed from theory to LAW. Better to keep your mouth shut and have everyone think you are an idiot than to open it and leave no doubt. Take solace in the fact that you aren't the only person to post this, it happens a few times a week.
2016-05-18 22:58:38 · answer #2 · answered by ? 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Vegetable Oil, Water, Hybrid, Electric + some others were all tested in the UK. Water was really poor. Didnt last very long at all with the current technology. You would have to stop every 20min to get more water. Electric was the best. No emissions on electric either.
2007-07-10 11:20:20 · answer #3 · answered by matt v 1 · 0⤊ 2⤋
And how will those big car companies make any money?
You mean that all those soldiers killed should have gone for nothing?. Its all about money, it has nothing to do what is right, what should be done... but how much are We going to make? great idea, but will never happen!!! SORRY...
EDIT- dot you think they could make a car that will run almost forever?, or a battery that will lst the life of two cars? or a tire that doesht wear out?
2007-07-10 11:26:48 · answer #4 · answered by Dragon'sFire 6 · 0⤊ 3⤋
Cars cannot run on water. Learn some basic chemistry.
2007-07-10 11:57:47 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
Can you inagine what the Big oil companys would say to that,
It would go over like a fart in church. It was the big oil companies
that did away with San Fransisco's trolly cars. Buses used gas and oil.
2007-07-10 11:24:39 · answer #6 · answered by nexteltom17 4 · 1⤊ 2⤋
Right now it is costly for normal folks, plus there is still room for more improvements. I would say in 10 years it should be ready for consumer use...if there's money in it you can bet that companies will invest in it, but if no one will buy it why bother? It's all about marketing and what our mentality is.
2007-07-10 11:19:36 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 2⤋
Total urban legend. The link you provided is 404 (not found). Just remember, the National Enquirer is not real news...
2007-07-10 11:16:29 · answer #8 · answered by davidmi711 7 · 2⤊ 1⤋
It is not within the purview of the federal government to support or promote any particular technology or business over another.
2007-07-10 15:10:23 · answer #9 · answered by jonesohms 2 · 0⤊ 2⤋
Bush still wants to rape the American people while helping his business friends. Hey man I never voted for him.
2007-07-10 11:17:09 · answer #10 · answered by andy2210 2 · 2⤊ 1⤋