No, no, NO, nO and NO!!!
I didn't vote for him the first two times.
I wouldn't vote for him if I was forced to do so at gunpoint!
I wouldn't vote for him if he was the last person on earth.
I wouldn't vote for him if GOD told me to vote for him.
I wouldn't vote for him if SATAN told me to vote for him.
I wouldn't vote for him if you promised me everything I ever desired in my lifetime.
You could stick needles in my eyes if I didn't vote for him
I still would not vote for Dubya.
Never, ever, never, never, never, ever voted for him,
Never, ever, never, never, never, ever would!
As a matter of fact, George W. Bush is a criminal of the first degree, and should be impeached, tried, and imprisoned for Treason, making false statements to get the US into a war, illegally wiretapping citizens while not following the FISA law, condoning the use of torture, to name a few. If it's too late for impeachment, call him to the World Court after his term is up. This man, and his cronies need to have justice served!
2007-07-10 08:57:22
·
answer #1
·
answered by Rocco R 4
·
2⤊
3⤋
Wow, totally surprised this wasn't removed. LOL Anyways, we can weight all the pros and cons to this situation, and everything. But I don't care who is in office there is always going to be someone that doesn't like the president, that always wants the president impeached. That is mostly because everyone of them says that they will do this or they will do that, and it doesn't happen. They talk themselves into circles and don't know how to get back out of it. Every politician will do it, they can't avoid it and I don't care who they are. Some of them will doing better at what they said that they would do, but nature has to work with them too. George had to raise gas prices because when Katrina came that wiped out quite a bit of where our gas came from and depleted our gas, so he had to raise the gas prices so people wouldn't use their vehicles as much or they would have to pay money so that things could be fixed. This probably could have been avoided if our country would come together even more and help out others in need and help rebuild what has been lost in the cities and states that need it. It is easy to put the blame on someone else and say what a bad job what they are doing when you are not in that position, but things have changed dramatically singe George Washington was elected to office. You need to take that into consideration. I don't agree with everything that Bush has done, but no one can say that Kerry would have done any better in the circumstances that Bush has been dealt. If you think that you can do better, then you run, and we'll see how good you can do. I am not directing this at anyone specific, I am directing this to everyone out there that is knocking George Bush or anyone else that has been or is currently in office.
2007-07-13 13:15:08
·
answer #2
·
answered by pixeydust77 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
Probably not though I think that history will be good to him as a President who was forced to react to an attack on America about eight months into his first term. People forget that the invasion of Iraq was done with the blessing of the Democratic majority in Congress which is why they want to pretend now that W is both stupid but fooled them into voting for a war. Politicians are full of it and people just eat it up. Eight years is enough for anyone. Clinton's administration was in a shambles at the end of eight years, we need a new President but as a Dem I am not sure the Dem Party has it anymore. The best candidate and easily the most qualified is Dem Gov. Bill Richardson of NM who has been an ambassador, Sec of Energy, is a proven diplomat and is Hispanic. Probably the man of the hour at the right time. Nope, we will get Barbara Streisand's pick Hillary, or the lunatic left's pick Obama. Never forget that Dems voted Bush into office, twice, because the Dem candidates were so weak. Richardson or get used to the idea of Fred Thompson's melodic tones.
2007-07-10 08:36:13
·
answer #3
·
answered by Tom W 6
·
5⤊
2⤋
I said this before, and I'll say it again. They could have a goat run as the Democratic nominee for President, and it would win by a landslide. Our country is so sick and tired by the narrow minded views and bullying that has been done by this administration. You'd be hard pressed to find anyone (with any intelligence anyway) who would actually vote for George Bush, Jr. again.
2007-07-10 08:37:01
·
answer #4
·
answered by cynthiajean222 6
·
4⤊
2⤋
I have no doubt in my mind that the populace would re-re-elect the cheeky little monkey. They like his style and don't mind if he causes a little trouble. The Man in the Big Yellow Hat (PNAC) will always be there for guidance. That was Addy's problem, he had no guidance. Where Addy failed Curious George could quite conceivably succeed.
I am the Fringe and this scenario requires a poet laureate.
2007-07-10 10:11:59
·
answer #5
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
1⤋
Here are todays headlines...
Al-Qaida threatens UK over Rushdie honor
By ALFRED de MONTESQUIOU, Associated Press Writer
CAIRO, Egypt - Al-Qaida's No. 2 issued a new audiotape on Tuesday threatening to retaliate against Britain for honoring the novelist Salman Rushdie
You Liberals and Democrats are worried about gasoline prices while you drive your big cars and you are worried about Iraq War when you should be worried that crazy muslims want to blow up an ally....and for what? For knighting Salman Rushdie...a novelist...Why are you not bitching about freedom of speach possibly being threatened by crazies...What is next? what you wear, what you read and what church you go to and sharia law...the very way you live is under attack and its not BUSH
Would I vote for Bush over a democrat...You bet I would...
2007-07-10 08:52:56
·
answer #6
·
answered by Anonymous
·
3⤊
0⤋
I loathe 5-4. Everytime the man opens his mouth we get lied to. Vote for him? I will vote the straight meadow party ticket first!! (Bill the cat for President and Opus for Vice President)
2007-07-10 09:55:17
·
answer #7
·
answered by Jini 1
·
2⤊
1⤋
Depends on how bad of a candidate the Dems put up again. They keep forgetting that their candidate should not only be acceptable to them but quite a few other Independent voters and disgruntled Republicans. It isn't always just about you.
2007-07-10 08:34:51
·
answer #8
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
2⤋
Wow, if he was somehow able to maintain power for four more years, I wouldn't be surprised if there was a mass exodus, riots and civil chaos, assasination attempts and our removal as a superpower on the international scene.
I would never vote for Bush or someone who shares his ideals becaues I care about our country.
2007-07-10 08:45:25
·
answer #9
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
3⤋
I never voted for him to begin with... I think I have a good trend going. Why ruin it?
2007-07-10 10:25:45
·
answer #10
·
answered by Lily Iris 7
·
2⤊
0⤋