English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

The closest they come is "well Clinton --------- (fill in the blank).

2007-07-10 07:45:03 · 17 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government Politics

17 answers

Why are you capable of posting only generalized questions that reflect badly on your intelligence?

2007-07-10 07:50:04 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 2 0

The question is ridiculous. All true leaders are prone to mistakes. If you spent as much time on reading news from Wall Street Journal as you do the New York Times, you'd find that favorable public opinion of the president has dropped dramatically. His own party members are critical of his lack of leadership. However, he has taken a strong stance to allow Iraq to fortify itself while his detractors do nothing but criticize his efforts. They offer no solutions and are more interested in creating devisive "tax and spend" legislation. The Clinton family are "media darlings'-they can do no wrong. Did you know they both were disbarred from law practice in their home state (something the mainline media doesn't address)?
To HAHACHARADE: You are actually under media-hypnosis!

2007-07-10 15:00:31 · answer #2 · answered by ugandanprince 3 · 0 0

In answer to your question, look at the results of SB1639. The conservative voters came out overwhelmingly against SB1639 which was supported by Bush. There were so many conservatives calling in opposition to this bill that the phone systems at the capital crashed. That is how voters are able to keep their president and other elected officials in check.

2007-07-10 14:56:07 · answer #3 · answered by erictompkins1970 2 · 0 0

Which cons are you referring to exactly? Convicts? Contortionists? Conformists?

Because most conservatives that I know do admit freely when the President makes a decision they don't approve of. Just because I am conservative does not mean I fall in line lock-step. I don't only vote republican. I vote for the best person. I don't hold to a party line. I vote my own convictions.

2007-07-10 14:51:28 · answer #4 · answered by ItsJustMe 7 · 3 1

Senator Richard Lugar and other Republicans have been critical of Bush's conduct of the war.

2007-07-10 14:48:33 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 3 0

Every real conservative is extremely pissed off about the border issue/illegal invasion issue.

Many conservatives have been very vocal and critical of him on this all along.

Bill O'Reilly being a bit of a left-leaner has been very critical of the war.

2007-07-10 14:52:33 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0 1

Because most conservatives are not brainwashed by the liberal lies and can see the truth about the good things Bush has done. But most libs are so full of lies they wouldn't know the truth if it was right there in front of them.

2007-07-10 14:51:56 · answer #7 · answered by flyguy03 3 · 2 1

I do hold him accountable. Do not generalize like that.

2007-07-10 14:47:46 · answer #8 · answered by Abu#2 4 · 3 0

That is one of the most backward things I ever heard a DIM say. It is only DIMS that don't hold their politicians accountable.

2007-07-10 14:52:06 · answer #9 · answered by bravozulu 7 · 1 2

Nobody from either party holds their people accountable. Thats why we are getting exactly the inept government we all deserve for not demanding better

2007-07-10 14:47:48 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 3 3

fedest.com, questions and answers