English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

Do you think that things like unauthorized wiretaps are a necessary evil for national security, or is this going too far? Your opinions?

2007-07-10 07:23:11 · 10 answers · asked by Adam C 3 in Politics & Government Law & Ethics

10 answers

During a time of war sometimes measures need to be taken. This can be turned back when there is peace. But when you move towards socialism you give up all your rights and privacy, and there is no way back from that.

2007-07-10 07:27:10 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 1 1

I don't like the idea of being spied on

yet, if someone has nothing to hide, then why worry?

I support the ACLU yet I see advantages in having more info in the hands of the cops.

We give up some freedoms and it makes us safer.

2007-07-10 07:31:48 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 1 0

I have nothing to hide at all, so it doesn't bother me in the least.

Just think if this is how things were done, we might not have lost so many lives on 911.

What do you want the government to do when everything in place is not working, and this country is being overrun by illegals???

2007-07-10 07:32:50 · answer #3 · answered by ♥ ♥Be Happi♥ ♥ 6 · 0 0

It's bad enough passing laws that invade our privacy without actually resulting in any significant benefit.

When the government BREAKS THE LAW to do something that is unreasonable and not helpful, that's way over the line.

2007-07-10 07:30:08 · answer #4 · answered by coragryph 7 · 1 1

get real dude, you already are.....try posting something anti-govt or pro-terrorist on here and theyll be monitoring ur emails. but if it keeps some whackjob from flying a plane into an office building, IM ALL FOR IT

2007-07-10 07:40:46 · answer #5 · answered by tex 3 · 0 0

no-
"unauthorized wiretaps are a necessary evil "
I think you see the answer.

2007-07-10 12:12:55 · answer #6 · answered by sirbobby98121 7 · 0 1

The government is always trying to sell us one evil villain or another in order to get us to give up money, rights, and political power. While I do not diminish the threat of "terrorism", I do not wish to become a third world country to fight it. Better to die free than live in bondage. Isn't that what our ancestors fought for?

2007-07-10 07:29:44 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0 2

No. Any sacrifce of privacy is usually never given back after the "crisis" is over.

2007-07-10 07:32:30 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 0 1

Hell no. Sacrificing freedom for security means you're neither free nor safe.

2007-07-10 07:31:24 · answer #9 · answered by parcequilfaut 4 · 1 1

Oh boo hoo hoo. I have nothing to hide. What is it that you have to hide? Drugs, incest, cheating on your spouse, lies what? If you have something to hide then you deserve and need to be caught in the act.

2007-07-10 07:29:46 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 0 2

fedest.com, questions and answers