English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

I would really like if it is not hooked up to a hose and if it will not suck so much on the lining that it will cause wrinkles. also, I would prefer it to be less than $700 unless it is realy worth it. no need for a remote controlled.

2007-07-10 04:45:16 · 3 answers · asked by Anonymous in Home & Garden Other - Home & Garden

3 answers

You aren't going to find a self contained unit that doesn't run on the skimmer and that will work effectively.

Less than 20 minutes per day and you can manually vacuum the pool. This gives you the chance to inspect it, test the water and make minor adjustments, as well as give you some alone time to drink your coffee and have a smoke (if you do).

Robotic cleaners will tie up a skimmer and if you only have one in the pool then you have essentially cut your filtration capabilities in half by using one.

Sorry.

2007-07-10 05:46:37 · answer #1 · answered by Rob_n_Liz 6 · 0 0

I had a pool cleaner and had nothing but problems with it. The plastic piece that the hose connected to kept breaking. The company was good about replacing it free but it was still a hassle. I ended up cleaning it by hand. Overall, it was not worth the money.

2007-07-10 13:17:28 · answer #2 · answered by sensible_man 7 · 0 0

Check out www.creationpools.com I have a frog called a Ribbit. that cleans the bottom of the pool .

2007-07-12 11:57:00 · answer #3 · answered by tinak 2 · 1 0

fedest.com, questions and answers