Which is the better film?
2007-07-10 03:58:21 · 12 answers · asked by Anonymous in Entertainment & Music ➔ Movies
Shakespeare in love
2007-07-10 05:08:13 · answer #1 · answered by what's her name 2 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Finding Neverland by a mile. Is there any performance as overrated and as painful to watch as Paltrow in Shakespeare??? She has absolutely no acting talent, and she's brutal in that film. On the other hand, all the actors, especially the little kids, are great in Neverland.
2007-07-10 05:39:37 · answer #2 · answered by Bob Mc 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Finding Neverland
2007-07-10 04:03:35 · answer #3 · answered by M. 2 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Finding Neverland. Imaginative and lovely. "Shakespeare in Love" was completely boring and did not deserve the Best Picture Oscar. Typical chicken-guts Academy choice.
2007-07-10 04:02:28 · answer #4 · answered by Nightlight 6 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Although "Finding Neverland" is a decent movie, I prefer "Shakespeare in Love". It's funnier, and better acted.
2007-07-10 04:06:47 · answer #5 · answered by swdlong 1 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I haven't seen Shakespeare in Love, but I absolutely LOVE Finding Neverland. A role played by Johnny Depp that I highly respect. I normally don't like drama movies, but this one was great. In my opinion...
2007-07-10 04:04:05 · answer #6 · answered by Becca 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Shakespeare In love was the better film. The plot, style and actors and actresses were all better. I think Shakespeare IN Love was one of Gwyenth Paltrow's best films ever
2007-07-10 04:43:39 · answer #7 · answered by cooldude 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Shakespeare in Love. No question
2007-07-10 04:01:32 · answer #8 · answered by wlucynsky 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Despite my undying love for Johnny Depp, Shakespeare in Love is the better of the two, no question about it.
2007-07-10 04:24:42 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Shakespeare in Love, but I prefer the Amelia Earhardt biopic......"Never Finding Land".
2007-07-10 04:02:27 · answer #10 · answered by Sonny Hooper 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋