If you don't support the president and his policies, does that mean you support Al-Qaeda and their barbarism of getting people to "think their way" which includes cutting the heads off children perhaps in front of the parents before they kill the parents or perhaps after they kill the parents in front of the children? Do you support this kind of barbarism? Do you support the kind of barbarism in which Al-Qaeda "bakes" 11 year old children and then serves the child to the parents at a luncheon to the parents in an effort to get the parents to "think their way?" Do you support this kind of barbarism? Unspeakable things are happening in Iraq in the name of Islam. Do you support these things or do you just want us to stick our heads in the sand and our fingers in our ears and scream "la-la-la-la-la?" These acts are so unbelieveable I am giving you a link so you can read it for yourself if you care to or are you so fat, dumb and happy you don't have the stomach to admit you are wrong about us being over there?
2007-07-10 03:05:07
·
answer #1
·
answered by Bill G 6
·
2⤊
0⤋
Yes Saddam was a dictator that killed his own people, Bush sent other people into a sovereign country that had no connection to the war on terror to kill their people ( don't try the al-qaeda in Iraq argument, as it has been established that it was not there before the invasion or occupation by the United States. Saddam hated al-Qaeda so the claim he was sheltering them is just a falacy which Cheney has even admitted).
Huh ,what war crimes?
2007-07-10 03:14:35
·
answer #2
·
answered by douglas m 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
No. Saddam was a dictator who murdered his own people.
Bush is an elected President with the power to send troops into conflict. AND, he did so with the approval of Congress even though many of them are back-peddling now.
Do you have any particular instances of war crimes that you can refer to, or were you just throwing the term around without really understanding what it means? Check the link below for clarification.
2007-07-10 03:05:33
·
answer #3
·
answered by ItsJustMe 7
·
2⤊
0⤋
Yep you are ever so smart and right! After George Bush started that war with Canada and had all those little kids out there as mine sweepers in front of the troops...OOps, I guess he DIDNT do that. But then there were those airliners that Bush personally flew into the World Trade Center and the Pentagon,,,,,OH, guess he didnt do THAT either. Well, there were all those opponents in Congress and the media that he had killed by firing squads....OH NO, He didnt do THAT either. OK, OK, How about all those Kurds he murdered with Weapons of Mass Destruction he got from Saddam Hussein and.....OOps, guess that's another one he DIDNT do.Well then, there were those Olympic atheletes who didnt do so well so he had his daughters grind them up in wood chippers,,,,,What? He didnt do THAT either?
In case you didnt bring a radio or something with you when you placed your head up your lower intestine, there was this little thing called 9/11 which turns out to have been done by terrorists sheltered by SoDamn Insane and his cronies in Iraq. In addition, SoDamn had a nasty habit of attacking our few allies in the region. Guess you aint so smart as you fantasize you are, huh?
2007-07-10 03:16:03
·
answer #4
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋
No, Bush's war crimes trials will come later. He and Cheney will be together through the whole trial. Their fate will then be determined and world may get the two for one bargain.
2007-07-10 03:23:21
·
answer #5
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
a million. saddam became attempt and hung by ability of his very own human beings. 2. there is not any attempt in this us of a to impeachment Bush no longer even by ability of the hot speaker of the abode. Beside why no longer penal complex a serial rapist or rapist that are professional-selection can get off scot unfastened?
2016-10-01 07:18:46
·
answer #6
·
answered by prindle 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
Are you an illegal who knows nothing about this country?
If you haven't heard yet, Mr. Bush has committed no war crimes..............!!!!!
2007-07-10 03:06:36
·
answer #7
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
war crimes? what war crimes? He didn't condemn anyone or group of people to death. I hope that i get thumbs down, because this is ridiculous.
2007-07-10 03:05:41
·
answer #8
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
No, what crimes do you speak of. Sounds to me like the rope would have looked good around your neck.
2007-07-10 03:02:01
·
answer #9
·
answered by bildymooner 6
·
2⤊
0⤋
The answers above mine are absolutely incredible. I'm in shock at the utter stupidity.
No wonder this country is about come apart at the seams.
2007-07-10 03:10:06
·
answer #10
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
1⤋