I mean they are meant to fly freely..hence the expression 'Free as a bird'
2007-07-10 02:44:10 · 10 answers · asked by tanzaniancameljockey 3 in Entertainment & Music ➔ Polls & Surveys
Thank you Masha...and no I am not a PETA Retard as you so kindly pointed assumed I was
2007-07-10 02:51:20 · update #1
I agree with you. It's like forcing kids to stay inside all day. It just ain't natural!
2007-07-10 02:47:11 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
If the bird is caged from birth, it won't know any different, and will be perfectly content living in a cage. However, taking a bird from the wild, and caging it would be pretty cruel. Some people who have pet birds do let them fly around the house.
2007-07-10 02:48:22 · answer #2 · answered by Tikimaskedman 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
i think of it may be much greater cruel to permit a puppy that small to wander around and discover information on the thank you to get harm. holding it in an opulent cage with exciting wheels, tubes and the all they are able to eat buffet is a much greater powerful, and safer, existence. in case you have been given a great abode with a persevering with caretaker to bathe the abode and handle your wellbeing desires, countless nutrients aspects, your admired activity products, and by no ability having to paintings or pay a bill lower back for something of your existence, does not you be satisfied? this is concerning the comparable for them. inspite of the incontrovertible fact that, i'm not sure why every physique could purposely save a rodent as a puppy. they are vile nasty little creatures, in my own opinion. yet, to each their very own.
2016-10-01 07:18:15 · answer #3 · answered by prindle 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I think so. I mean, birds are meant to fly!If you want a pet in a cage, get a chinchilla or something
2007-07-10 02:47:46 · answer #4 · answered by ♫ ali 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Yes, and the diseases that people get from having birds in their homes are numerous. One is Crohns disease. It's from infants being exposed to bird feces...nice, huh? Any adult with Crohns lived with a bird as a child, either at their home, the babysitters house, a relative's home, etc. And that's a horrible thing to live with just so you could have a pet? Ew.
2007-07-10 02:51:35 · answer #5 · answered by wwhrd 7 · 0⤊ 2⤋
Are you one of those PETA retards? Animal cruelty would be beating or starving the things, ok? If I set my cockatiel free, it would not survive. It wouldn't know how to get its own food, die from exposure, or be killed by a predator. Setting it free to let *that* happen would be cruelty.
2007-07-10 02:49:00 · answer #6 · answered by Masha 4 · 1⤊ 1⤋
it is considered ok, but if you put it that way, keeping almost anything as a pet is cruel
2007-07-10 02:52:13 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
No, I mean, couldn't cats and dogs run freely if they wanted too? If you don't like it, don't preach to us. I sure don't want to hear it.
2007-07-10 02:51:22 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 1⤋
Many birds are bred domestically. so it is okay
2007-07-10 02:46:40 · answer #9 · answered by Lefty 7 · 2⤊ 0⤋
Yes, it is but keeping flightless birds in zoo which has a feel like there own habitat is not. Tat's wat i think.
2007-07-10 02:55:26 · answer #10 · answered by t.v. lover yo 3 · 0⤊ 1⤋