what will become of the middle east? i understand,..you want peace...but what you will get is WAR! war that surpasses what we saw in world war 2. think about it.
2007-07-10 00:28:01 · 15 answers · asked by federalistcapers 2 in Politics & Government ➔ Other - Politics & Government
turkey has amassed 140,000 troops on it's border with iraq...they fear they will fall to the extremists from iran..then egypt falls, pakistan falls, then, they have nukes and the whole world goes crazy. watch.
2007-07-10 00:37:07 · update #1
They will continue fighting the Civil War that they are already engaged in and Al Queda will perhaps disengage because there won't be any Americans there to blow up. Or perhaps they will stay engaged and side up with the side they prefer (Sunnis or Shites) and blow them up. Better them than Americans. Believe it or not, we do not have the resources to police the World. Just ask the Pentagon!
2007-07-10 06:35:43 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
It would have been nice if someone that started this war had thought about things like this. Its a blood bath right now and our troops under there current orders can not do anything to stop it.
2007-07-10 08:54:34 · answer #2 · answered by David R 5 · 1⤊ 0⤋
It's very possible that the Sunnis and Shitties would settle down after we leave. But since we wanted them to have elections and democracy, we have to accept that some day in the future they might elect a nutjob like Iran's leader.
What are we going to do then, control their elections to make sure they select someone in line with America?
2007-07-10 07:35:15 · answer #3 · answered by topink 6 · 2⤊ 0⤋
The two armies in proximity are the Turkish and the Iranians. I would give the edge to the Turks. The American forces would be hard-pressed to conduct an orderly retreat.
2007-07-10 07:40:13 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
It does not matter. Either way there is no good option for them either in the short term. The sooner we leave, the sooner they can have their civil war, sort things out and end up where they are going to be anyway.
2007-07-10 07:34:52 · answer #5 · answered by planksheer 7 · 1⤊ 0⤋
all you're missing here is a little fire and brimstone, and you can cook up a regular armegeddon. no need for that.
turkey is woried about free kurdistan which which occupies turkish real estate. as in any case, there is a natural order in iraq which will come to define itself, with us or without us. perhaps iraq will cease to exist. why not let them be mesopatamia, kurdistan?
2007-07-10 07:51:06 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 0⤋
There will be even more barbarism...they are now inviting people over for dinner to convert them to Al-Qeida and serving these unsuspecting families their own young sons, baked and stuffed...if you haven't heard of this, you NEED to go to this website and read this report!
These are the kind of people we are dealing with, if you others on this forum haven't noticed! We need to annilate these a$$holes once and for all!
2007-07-10 11:30:42 · answer #7 · answered by EM 2 · 1⤊ 1⤋
what matters really is what the majority of this country wants, or wanted in the case of viet nam. i think what the majority wants is pretty clear to most of us. the majority rules in a presidential election. why not now? i thought that these guys worked for us. to the contributor ahead of me, i lost my tail at birth, you still got yours? we left. should have been sooner. my mama told me not to play in traffic, and iraq and viet nam are traffic areas.
2007-07-10 08:17:06 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
To Don. Sorry to say, but the US did not pull out of Vietnam they ran away with their tail between their legs. You would have thought that the US would have learned their lesson there instead of invading Iraq. Wouldn't you?
2007-07-10 08:08:30 · answer #9 · answered by laotzu4272 5 · 0⤊ 2⤋
The average Iraqi will be murdered in response to attacks from Al Qaeda and the Militias.
That can not be an option.
2007-07-10 07:46:38 · answer #10 · answered by ? 6 · 0⤊ 3⤋