well I am from Boston but I'll have to go with Chicago for music
2007-07-09 19:05:55
·
answer #1
·
answered by Harry Hood 6
·
1⤊
0⤋
Chicago
2007-07-10 02:04:24
·
answer #2
·
answered by ▒Яenée▒ 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
Chicago
2007-07-10 02:04:09
·
answer #3
·
answered by Nico 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
I love them both... I don't think they can be compared favorably... Chicago is more prolific and has some amazing horn arrangements in the early days... but the debut Boston album was one of the first I bought after my KISS phase in the 70's.... tough choice, but I'm going with Chicago. Interestingly enough... I've never been to Boston, and I only just visited Chicago for the first time this past November.
2007-07-10 02:08:23
·
answer #4
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Boston 10,000,000,000,000,000 X better than Chicago
2007-07-10 02:05:27
·
answer #5
·
answered by Q 2
·
0⤊
1⤋
It's more than a feeling...I'm going with
Boston
2007-07-10 02:07:36
·
answer #6
·
answered by Valkyrie of Lor 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
Chicago ROCKS!!
2007-07-10 02:05:24
·
answer #7
·
answered by LIEUTENANT K STAR!!!! 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
How funny,I asked this the other day! I prefer Boston.
2007-07-10 10:48:23
·
answer #8
·
answered by Candi Apples 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
chicago
2007-07-10 02:05:36
·
answer #9
·
answered by ? 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
boston
2007-07-10 02:04:03
·
answer #10
·
answered by MattTheWiseAssGecko 4
·
0⤊
0⤋