Is the Speed of Dark faster, or the same as, the Speed of Light?

Answer 1

Dark does not have a speed, as it is a perceived indicator of the presence of Darkon particles. Darkon particles usually remain stationary for long periods of time, but anti-darkon emitters (such as most energy sources) cause Darkon particles to flee, and in the absence of Darkon particles, we have Light. Once an anti-darkon emitter is removed from a region, the Darkon particles return. At this point, the perceiver is tempted to observe and measure "the speed of Dark", however this is fallacious. The only metric possible is the rate of return from the perturbed state (absence of Darkons) to the normal state (presence of Darkons, and perceived darkness).

It is equally wrong to speak of the speed of light, because as we have just seen, light does not really exist, it is a perceived indicator of the absence of Darkon particles.

Answer 2

Darkness is the absence of light.

Particles of light (photons) move at 299,792,458 m/s. Darkness occurs when there aren't any hitting your eyes. Since they leave at the same speed they approach, you'd have to say the two speeds are the same if indeed "speed of dark" has any meaning at all.

Nothing known is faster than the speed of light, and there's good reason to believe that nothing with non-zero rest mass can accelerate to that speed, let alone past it, because it would require infinite energy to do so.

Answer 3

In the previous times that this question was asked, the best 'tongue-in-cheek' answer (meaning: not serious) is that dark is definitely faster because it is always there ahead of light.

However, in scientific tests (yes, they even test these things), the speed of a laser beam is the same whether it has interruptions in it (dark gaps) or is continuous. When the laser light is slowed down in some medium (e.g. glass or air), the dark gaps are slowed down at exactly the same rate as the light.

Answer 4

This is a matter of semantics not physics.

When you talk about light and dark, you are talking about adjectives that describe the current condition.

When talking about light, the radiation, you are talking about a physical thing – a noun.

Therefore it is nonsense to say the speed of dark – absolute nonsense.

It's like saying what is the speed of beauty, or the speed of tall.

Answer 5

Dark is the absence of light, so yes, as the photons leave an area of space, and dark fills the space as the photons travel away. It would be the same speed as light.

Answer 6

There is no speed of dark, its just the absence of light. So in essence you need to only know the speed of light.

Answer 7

There are 3 factors that at as quickly as impression exposure. a million. Aperture 2. Shutter velocity 3. ISO placing (sensitivity of the action picture, or of the image sensor in digital cameras) you have pronounced you like a quickly shutter velocity to capture the quickly-shifting merchandise. a quickly shutter velocity - different 2 factors last unchanged - will bring about much less mild being captured by making use of the image sensor, and the effect is what think ofyou've have been given, i.e.: an below uncovered photograph. in case you utilize a quickly shutter velocity you are able to purely counter the effect by making use of making use of the different 2 factors, i.e.: aperture and ISO. you are able to the two open up the aperture (use a great aperture/low f selection), use a greater suitable ISO placing, or the two. As you understand fixing the aperture will impression the intensity of fileld, hence establishing up the aperture to get in greater mild will bring about a shallow DoF. If shallow DoF is undersirable then you rather've purely one thank you to bypass: jack up the ISO till you get the needed exposure.

Answer 8

dark does not travel this is the opposite nature of two opposte things u only remove the heat and cold is automatically there u dont need to enter cooling if u just remove the heat u find cooling similarly dark does not travel if u remove the light there is a dark automatilcally or naturally

Answer 9

This is a rather dated question (I remember asking that back in the 1970's). The answer is its the same speed.

Answer 10

i think the speed of light is faster