I'm going to answer your question this way.
Why do you think there are different political parties? It causes people to take sides and in turn we end up pointing fingers at each other.
No one seems to understand that regardless of your political affiliation, we need to stand up for our constitutional rights.
If we all would do that then we would have agreements instead of having differences of opinions and would take back our country because of our common beliefs in the constitution.
Freedom of speech. Any questions? The right to bear arms. Any questions? Freedom of the press. Any questions? TAXATION WITHOUT REPRESENTATION. Any questions?
Our very freedoms are being taken away from us right from under our noses. Isn't that what we should be concerned about?
I don't care if you are republican, democrat or liberal. What I do care about is do you believe in the very document which our forefathers so bravely fought for?
Our forefathers didn't want a central banking system but yet we have the Federal Reserve Bank. It isn't federal and it is a privately owned corporation designed to bankrupt our nation.
There is no congressional oversight anymore of the Federal Reserve Bank because there is no more M3 reporting. M3 reporting was letting our congressional leaders know how much money was being printed up.
Our congressional leaders have failed us miserably by letting this privately owned corporation stop M3 reporting.
So my question to you is this--what's more important? Your political views or we, as Americans, fighting for our rights given to us by the constitution?
2007-07-09 16:50:16
·
answer #1
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Well, in general I think the so called 9/11 truthers are liberals, and those are fear based questions, and we are often hit alot with those. Ah yes, and global warming of course. 10 years and we'll all be dead, ppppffftttt.
Conservatives don't really do anything that bad, but yes, the neo-cons are often a bit too hateful of the Middle East and say they're all gonna kill us and such so we must attack, now there is some truth in that but way overhyped.
But I see more 9/11 posts.
2007-07-09 13:39:12
·
answer #2
·
answered by Serpico7 5
·
4⤊
0⤋
That's tough. Liberals post lots of questions accusing Bush and his ilk of /using/ fear. That's a fear-based question, really. Similarly, conspiracy theories seem to me to be founded in fear, too, and are largely the province of the lefties. Conservative questions often betray a fear of change (apropriately enough), be it political, social, or otherwise. Neo-cons, of course, use sufficiently heated rhetoric that almost anything they say comes down to either defending America or attacking it - which of course, implies fear for the country.
2007-07-09 13:43:41
·
answer #3
·
answered by B.Kevorkian 7
·
2⤊
0⤋
The liberal/conservative chop up is extremely authentic. The label "neocon" is lots greater of a superficial insult. i think of that we are polarized right this moment usually because of the fact of numerous mandatory stunning courtroom judgements. In "The Federal Courts, Politics, and the guideline of regulation," via John C. Hughes (printed 1995), it says: "interior the present day political context, people who concern conformity have tended to describe themselves as liberal and characteristic tended to applaud judicial 'secure practices' of human rights. people who concern variety have tended to call themselves conservatives and characteristic been appalled via judicial 'usurpation' of the common public's discretion to variety the form of community it properly-knownshows maximum conducive to its own happiness. the former has a tendency to approve of the expansive theories of constitutional interpretation, on an identical time as the latter has a tendency to desire the limited theories of judicial assessment. those alignments are neither suited nor inevitable, however the debate has actually been shrill."
2016-10-20 11:46:37
·
answer #4
·
answered by ? 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
All of them do.
Let's begin with the conspiracy folks. I believe they're comprised of liberals, libertarians and indepents. You do know that we're in for another 'planned' 9/11 and let's not forget all of those prison camps that are springing up all over the place for people who aren't republicans. :)
Some of the liberals are scary because National security is the last things on their minds, so it seems. They scoff at the idea that one day we might be attacked again.
Cons are weary, yes. In particular, I feel as though we're setting ourselves up by leaving our borders wide open. If we're facing possible future terrorist attacks, this makes no sense to me.
I think that some place in between this mess might lie the answer.
2007-07-09 13:43:51
·
answer #5
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
0⤋
Chi-Guy, I'm very happy to see that you know the difference between conservatives and neocons. I've been gaining more and more respect for you everyday for sometime now actually.
That being said, I think it's about even. However, like with the crime in our nation, I believe that 5% of the crowd here is responsible for 90% of the crap we come across.
They come from all parties and hold a myriad of different beliefs.
2007-07-09 13:40:45
·
answer #6
·
answered by Anonymous
·
4⤊
0⤋
Liberals. Global warming. We are losing (or have lost) in Iraq. Bush is a dictator. Bush is destroying the Constitution. Bush will declare martial law. & the list goes on.
2007-07-09 15:21:14
·
answer #7
·
answered by yupchagee 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
Both are bad. It will always depend on the issue and which side can spin it to their best advantage. Ex: for tax increases, the Dems will holler "For the Chillldren!" Ultra-liberals are the worst because they like to play the race-ethnic cards.
2007-07-09 13:41:09
·
answer #8
·
answered by Scottish Dachsy 5
·
2⤊
2⤋
I am not sure. I ignore the ones which offend.
Many of them block me anyway. LOL
2007-07-09 13:55:11
·
answer #9
·
answered by ? 7
·
2⤊
1⤋
neocons- they are the most afraid and generate the most fear.
2007-07-09 13:39:50
·
answer #10
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
5⤋