I've seen plenty of moronic attempts to "expose the truth" about 9/11, but I just can't get past one thing.
Let's say the govt. did bring down the world trade center and crash the plane into the pentagon and shot down flight 93.
Let's just pretend that the piece of garbage known as Loose Change is accurate,w hy is Dylan Avery, the creator of Losse Change, still alive?
I mean, according to him our government succesfully massacred thousands of people that day in front of millions of people.
So here's my question, if they were willing to do that, why haven't they seen to it that he have an unfortunate accident?
It makes sence, doesn't it?
If you had pulled off something like that only to have some punk college kid expose it all, wouldn't you kill him or see to it he was killed?
What's one more life after the thousands you took that day, and whats stopping you from silencing every other "truther" out there?
2007-07-09
12:31:48
·
23 answers
·
asked by
Anonymous
in
Politics & Government
➔ Other - Politics & Government
My logic behind this isn't just focused on Avery, I only said his name because he was one of the first people to make this whole conspiracy thing so well broadcast.
2007-07-10
06:10:21 ·
update #1
The government can't even keep it quiet that we have people on the ground in Iran and that we monitor calls to foreign countries where terrorists are supported.
How in the name of God could they keep a conspiracy about them planning the 9-11 attacks close to the vest.
The conspiracy theories are a bunch of bull.
2007-07-09 12:40:39
·
answer #1
·
answered by The Patrioteer 4
·
3⤊
1⤋
I could go on a rant here with all the reasons why George W Bush was on "vacation" so much of his first year(s) as president. He would have gotten in the way and maybe screwed up when it came his turn to play president.
The 2000 Florida voter fraud was necessary because Jeb Bush promised his brother he would win in Florida. The events for 9/11 were already in the works, large amounts of money had been spent on the specialty built aircraft that hit the towers. The US Supreme court appointed the George W. Bush president on a very close vote.
http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-5972696012004214536&q=2000+presidential+election&total=141&start=0&num=10&so=0&type=search&plindex=3
I don't believe 9/11 would have happened without "The Decider" to play his role as "mr tough talker" just like Osama bin-Laden has a good face to play the part as "Terrorist".
Mr. George H. W. Bush with the help of Cheney, Wolfowitz, the CIA, and secret covert operators from a lot of other countries pulled a Coup of the US government in 2000.
Why aren't they worried about the DVD ?
As a participant in the JFK assassination, the Warren Report was successful using the "lone gunman theory", and they still haven't been caught. They tampered with the Zapruder film and were successful. They destroyed all the evidence and there were a great many suspicious deaths of eyewitnesses.
They have learned over the years to spread disinformation. That is one of the jobs of the CIA and other covert operations.
They have edited certain shots ever so slightly. Removing a frame or two here and there. They can be very persuasive. They aren't in a rush. They are all taking our money away from us with their wars, lack of justice and the abuses of execuitive office. Why would they want to take anymore chances than they have to. Congress isn't doing anything, the executive office is taking care of that. That's why the 2000 fraud was perpetrated.
Please watch this 4 min music video.
http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=8356533112117126309&q=911+building+wtc+7&hl=en
Thank you for your question.
2007-07-09 13:57:43
·
answer #2
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
1⤋
What is "the government?" It sounds like people think it is one huge cohesive group that all behaves like bees in a hive. One goal, one master, one destiny.
Does "Loose Change" really blame the "government?" Been a while since I seen it. Raises some interesting points, was done too long ago to extrapolate on more recent findings and investigations.
Useful to build upon but the idea of our "government" conspiring to pull off 9/11 ignores the fact that 100 government employees are going in 100 directions. Everyone has their own agenda.
You have to really spend time exploring the evidence, and lack thereof, to consider more plausible alternatives. Those too will be called conspiracies.
The word "conspiracy" ignores the fact that Bin Laden directing secretive, shadowy fugitives from a cave in Afghanistan is the very definition of conspiring. The official line is the greatest conspiracy theory of them all. And one of the hardest to believe.
One should look at: Who could pull it off? Who would pull it off? Who gains the most from pulling it off? Who has talked of pulling it off?
The best answers to these questions include the PNAC, Mo*sad, Illumina*i, and central bankers. Not saying these chaps did it. But it makes a lot more sense than saying our "government" decided to do it.
By the way, the NWO may *want* you to believe that our government did it. Second best thing to those rascally Arabs.
2007-07-09 14:01:00
·
answer #3
·
answered by Watched 2
·
1⤊
1⤋
9/11 was not planned by the government. Here's what stupid, Democrats say George W. Bush is stupid, but if he was so stupid, how did he figure out this whole plan to blow up the world trade centers without anybody knowing? The whole 9/11 conspiracy is the dumbest thing I've ever heard of. When an airplane hits a building, it's going to cause an explosion due to the fuel inside it, and when an explosion occurs, things are going to get destroyed. And the towers fell straight down because that's how gravity works. People need to gain some common sense in this country.
2007-07-09 12:37:53
·
answer #4
·
answered by Daniel 2
·
2⤊
2⤋
The official clarification is BS. That a lot is obvious. in spite of if those planes have been hijacked as claimed, they should by no skill have reached their places. The air protection structures labored completely before 911 with a hundred% accuracy, and fully after 911 with a hundred% accuracy. purely a fool might have confidence that thrice on 9/eleven the device failed. Rogue factors in the government thwarted those air defenses. we are speaking the main heavily guarded air area in the worldwide for cryin' out loud! It does not wash.
2016-12-14 04:03:01
·
answer #5
·
answered by ? 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
how did a few bozos devise this plan (the 911 attacks) under the noses of the most advanced intellegence community on this planet? Why have every other terrorist attempt looked about as well planned as evil kneivel's jump over the snake river canyon. Why are ther always so many unanswerred questions when ever anything happens. I personnally think it is a pretty far fetched idea to have a gfaction of the government be directly responsible but I have ask myself why the intelligence community and those to whom they supposedly report were all "sleeping" at the same time.
2007-07-09 12:41:09
·
answer #6
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
2⤋
so your logic being: "since Avery still lives nobody could have reported explosions at the WTC?"
mnnnnn http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-972875032828177268&q=total+proof&total=161&start=0&num=10&so=0&type=search&plindex=0
btw great post 'Watched'.
it's amazing how many reject the false flag senario because they fall for the strawman: that to accept it can only mean it MUST have been done by e..g i) only by Bush ii) The 'Government' etc.
imagine a police investigation appraching a case by if 'A' didn't do it and in a specific way , it has to be ONLY one other possibility -what nonsense-
and to think some of these can be called for jury service ! -
2007-07-10 00:30:46
·
answer #7
·
answered by celvin 7
·
1⤊
1⤋
I think the real truth is they kept that punk college kid alive to make people think the government is ALL POWERFUL and can pull off such a major conspiracy without anybody knowing about it. It's just like the Roswell incident. A top secret government aircraft crashed there and they made it seem like it was a UFO so that people THINK there's this government conspiracy and we have alien technology in our hands.
2007-07-09 12:36:46
·
answer #8
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
2⤋
The standard conspiracy-theorist response to that question is that the conspirators 'fear' legitimizing the theorists claims by assassinating him.
That premise was used, for instance, in the Irwin Allen TV classic "The Invaders" to explain why the evil shapechaning aliens didn't ace the protagonist the same way they did everyone else who got in the way of thier schemes.
2007-07-09 12:37:06
·
answer #9
·
answered by B.Kevorkian 7
·
0⤊
1⤋
There is no conspiracy, only the right and the freedom to believe whatever you want, Its called democracy,.. a privilege that people doesn't have in the middle est.
2007-07-09 12:45:59
·
answer #10
·
answered by a Friend 5
·
0⤊
1⤋