English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

41 answers

because he doesn't want to die

2007-07-09 12:32:19 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 4 1

Because he would probably go to Afghanistan where the war was originally going to be, well never mind even that makes some logical sense which is not what bush is about. Sorry the man is too retarded to even get his head out of his ***, do you really think he is capable of leading something like a troop into battle? Oh never mind he would blow his own head off if anyone let him touch a lethal weapon like a gun.

I still have yet to hear any good reason for even thinking about going to Iraq I thought all those "terrorists" were from Afghanistan. Why is it that no one cares about Bin Laden anymore?

2007-07-09 15:12:41 · answer #2 · answered by stacey b 5 · 2 0

Bush is a politician, not a General. Way back in the long ago Kings sometimes led armies. Not the way it's done these days. Stalin never led troops, Hitler certainly never led men into battle, F.D.R, Churchill, and Sadam Hussein never went into the fray with the troops. W.C. Fields was asked once how he'd like to see WW2 resolved. He said, "Take the leaders of the warring countries and put them in the Rose Bowl and let them fight out their differences with a sock full of s**t." Unfortunately, the young people of any nation suffer the full magnitude of war.

2007-07-09 12:38:45 · answer #3 · answered by ToolManJobber 6 · 2 2

Ya - this is humorous to work out all those "help our troops" issues on the lower back of peoples' vehicles - yet our troops have been denied weapons and armor and circulate away and rotation - and whilst they get abode they are denied scientific help and so one etc. human beings are many times comprehensive idiots - they only pick to look like they help troops - as a rule they do no longer care. The conflict does not touch them - they only pick their tax rebate verify.

2016-10-01 06:27:42 · answer #4 · answered by rawson 4 · 0 0

I was at the V.A. hospital a few weeks ago and most of the vets there wanted to see Bush strapped to the front of an unarmored humvee and driven around Sadr City. I think they were a little upset. I think that he should lead a charge and find out what it is like to ask others to sacrifice their lives.

2007-07-09 16:16:24 · answer #5 · answered by ? 4 · 1 0

Generals gathered in their masses
Just like witches at black masses
Evil minds that plot destruction
Sorcerers of deaths construction
In the fields the bodies burning
As the war machine keeps turning
Death and hatred to mankind
Poisoning their brainwashed minds, oh lord yeah!

Politicians hide themselves away
They only started the war
Why should they go out to fight?
They leave that role to the poor

Time will tell on their power minds
Making war just for fun
Treating people just like pawns in chess
Wait till their judgement day comes, yeah!

Now in darkness, world stops turning
As the war machine keeps burning
No more war pigs of the power
Hand of God has sturck the hour
Day of judgement, God is calling
On their knees, the war pigs crawling
Begging mercy for their sins
Satan, laughing, spreads his wings
All right now!


Ozzy said it best did he not?

2007-07-09 12:35:59 · answer #6 · answered by J 2 · 5 2

He is the president. Name the last sitting president to lead the troops into battle. Can't? because it has never happened. No matter how just the war may be, it would not be right for a sitting president to lead the troops into battle.

2007-07-09 12:34:24 · answer #7 · answered by Truth is elusive 7 · 3 4

Well, he didn't 'personally' fulfill his obligations in the Texas Air National Guard, so why start now. Did you know that his daddy had him assigned to a fighter jet that was to be decommisioned from battle? Yes, GWB learned how to fly a jet that was already decommisioned from Vietnam War battle possibilities. Google it!!!!!!!!!!

2007-07-09 12:37:16 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 3 1

Emperors and kings have often lead their troops in wars and since Bush seems to want to be an emperor it would certainly be appropriate.

2007-07-09 12:41:11 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 3 2

Because he went AWOL from the Air Force (National Guard) years ago. He had too much "air" between his ears, which "forced" his daddy to yet again pulls some strings.

2007-07-09 12:36:11 · answer #10 · answered by Bemarian 3 · 3 1

Welcome to the 21st century. The last head of govt to personally lead troops in battle was Napolean.

2007-07-09 13:16:38 · answer #11 · answered by yupchagee 7 · 1 1

fedest.com, questions and answers