2007-07-09 12:12:26 · 11 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
If they can't.. should anybody be allowed to? Why should a person ability to impact elections be removed simply because they've got more money?
If you want to be fair about the process.. NOBODY should be allowed to do it. Not Green Peace. Not Exxon. Not the AFL-CIO. Nobody.
2007-07-09 12:19:20 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
The Can-Am loose commerce deal replaced into Regan/Bush and the NAFTA deal replaced into bill Clinton. Canadians enjoyed the Can -Am deal for a number of reasons yet truly ought to never understand the want for NAFTA different than for what replaced into meant to be a help in unlawful immigration into the U. S. via helping to enhance their economic device in Mexico. like the renewal of the "maximum famed international locations paying for and advertising status - everlasting" with China, Clinton probably value the U. S. greater long term jobs than any President interior the U. S. ever has or ever will! YAY.... WAL MART!!!
2016-10-20 11:35:17 · answer #2 · answered by ? 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Only if it would be placed on a public campaign record.
2007-07-09 12:20:37 · answer #3 · answered by Enigma 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Do you mean more than they already do. or more openly or what? Well I think not anyway. They have been corrupting the system far too long as it is.
2007-07-09 12:27:28 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Yeah, what the he11. At least it will be out in the open.
2007-07-09 12:15:36 · answer #5 · answered by MIKE F. 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
What, are you implying they should be allowed to pay them off indirectly?
2007-07-09 12:22:14 · answer #6 · answered by Darth Vader 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
The unions do it, why not corporate
2007-07-09 12:15:29 · answer #7 · answered by mission_viejo_california 2 · 0⤊ 2⤋
No it is conflict of interest at it's most blatant!
2007-07-09 12:17:40 · answer #8 · answered by Fluffy Wisdom 5 · 0⤊ 1⤋
Cash only and lots of freezers.
NO! :)
2007-07-09 12:15:24 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 2⤋
no they shouldnt, but we can blame reagan for that.
2007-07-09 12:14:54 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 1⤋