2007-07-09 11:34:40 · 16 answers · asked by Dangerous 2 in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
koalatcomics, if you are going to answer please don't lie.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Foreign_policy_of_the_Clinton_Administration
2007-07-09 11:43:48 · update #1
Because we need a looming specter to continue this so called "war on terror".
Be very afriad, Bin Ladin is out there plotting to kill you and your family!
2007-07-09 11:38:41 · answer #1 · answered by Mr.Robot 5 · 2⤊ 2⤋
Wouldnt you be reluctant to pursue the most evil man on the planet? Bush wants Bin Laden but doesnt want to trigger another 9/11, I would rather it be done right than fast.
2007-07-09 18:39:17 · answer #2 · answered by HLBellevino 5 · 1⤊ 1⤋
It'd probably undermine Pakistan's Musharrif (sp?) & ultimately, the whole Iraq campaign. Don't want that fine success going badly just when the insurgency is in its final throes, do we? Also, it would create an unanswerable question, "why are troops in Iraq" among more than 90% of the US populace.
2007-07-09 18:39:37 · answer #3 · answered by nipperrachel 2 · 1⤊ 1⤋
Because if he caught him he'd have to displace all the companies making billions of dollars off of the Iraq war with another illegal invasion on some other unsuspecting country
2007-07-09 18:38:27 · answer #4 · answered by CpprJnk 2 · 2⤊ 1⤋
He already has tried to. What makes you so ignorantly think that he hasn't? There was a time in the beginning of his presidency where he constantly spoke about him and his plan to "pursue" him.
Maybe his attempt was feeble, but at least he did try.
2007-07-09 19:01:52 · answer #5 · answered by Emma 6 · 1⤊ 1⤋
Because he'll be pressed to leave Iraq even harder if such a big battle in the 'war' is won.
2007-07-09 18:41:55 · answer #6 · answered by Atavacron 5 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Bin Laden's family and the Bush family have business ties going back to the 1960's.
2007-07-09 18:37:29 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 6⤊ 3⤋
Because he's dead in a cave and what would he do w/out his boogie man to frighten you with?
It's the ideology that he left behind that can't be beaten out of the people who essentially are happy to die to prove that you won't dominate and repress them in their own countries.
2007-07-09 18:41:21 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋
where do liberals come up with this stuff? the real question is why was clinton so reluctant to do it?
uss cole\
no response
african embassy bombings
no response
first wtc
no response
at least six chances to capture or kill bin laden in sudan
no reponse
any chance of seeing a pattern here liberal?
2007-07-09 18:39:51 · answer #9 · answered by koalatcomics 7 · 2⤊ 4⤋
He's reluctant to anything that is important like secure our borders, pardon Ramos & Compeon, etc...
2007-07-09 18:37:27 · answer #10 · answered by JessicaRabbit 6 · 2⤊ 1⤋