English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

There doesn't seem to be any more right-wing party to vote for.

Also, communism and fascism are two different forms of left-wing totalitarian forms of governance. Why do liberals want to associate fascism with the right wing which is defined by less government?

Shouldn't we all just say to hell with everybody running for president and vote for Ron Paul?
.

2007-07-09 10:39:52 · 8 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government Government

8 answers

That's no longer accurate.Think of it as a multi-party spectrum.

Some advocate large govt and lots of govt spending. Of these, some (liberals) want to do it to help people who can't take care of themselves, and some (neo-cons) want to do to enforce their social agenda.

Some want small govt and minimal govt spending. Of these, some (fiscal conservatives) want to promote stability and enforce their social agenda, while others (libertarians) want to get govt out of the regulation business as much as possible.

I'm assuming your question is actually intended to get an answer, and not just meant as a political advertisement.

2007-07-09 10:46:41 · answer #1 · answered by coragryph 7 · 2 1

Facism is NOT left wing, it is a corporate government partnership.

The "right wing" is not necessarily defined by less government, that is only the small libertarian faction. There is a strong element that believes the government should regulate individual behavior and pursue an imperial foriegn policy.

Don't be confused and think the Founding Fathers were libertarians -- they junked the Articles of Confederation and created a strong Central Government through the Constitution, which did not include a Bill of Rights -- the Jeffersonians had to fight for that. Federalists like Adams were perfectly happy to pass the Alien and Sedition Acts to imprison or exile people who criticized the government.

2007-07-09 10:50:17 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0 2

Sorry, Ron just isn't going to win the primaries.

I will support Fred (most likely). Yes, he probably won't be what some like in the war, but he for the most part believes in federalism ie limited federal authority, with most issues going to localities/states.

If we don't go back to our Constitutional principles, we'll never have small-government again. First we must start off with entitlements, and then we can focus on the little things. First things first, and I think Fred will do that.

2007-07-09 11:49:05 · answer #3 · answered by Rick 4 · 0 0

I agree with you about the more government less government thing. I am just not sure ron paul is the answer. But I will wait and see what develops.

2007-07-09 10:43:29 · answer #4 · answered by sociald 7 · 0 0

Jesus, no.

GOP was going the way of less government, but now stand for "only slightly less government than the Democrats."

Democracy can only last until the people realize they can vote themselves a raise.--Some guy I can't remember.

2007-07-09 10:57:13 · answer #5 · answered by Scott L 4 · 2 0

Barack Obama`s Lesson`s from Saul Alinsky`s "regulations for Radicals" ~ "community Organizing one hundred and one".. ***The interest of the organizer is to pass and bait the business enterprise so as that it will publicly attack him as a “risky enemy.” — P.one hundred*** ***The organizer committed to changing the lifestyles of a definite community could desire to first rub uncooked the resentments of the folk of the community; fan the latent hostilities of lots of the folk to the ingredient of overt expression. He could desire to get hold of controversy and subject concerns, quite than ward off them, for till there is controversy human beings at the instant are not in touch adequate to act. — P.116-117*** ***continuously bear in mind the 1st rule of potential strategies: potential isn't in trouble-free terms what you have yet what the enemy thinks you have.*** ***the 2nd rule is: by no skill pass exterior the adventure of your human beings.*** …***The third rule is: Whereever available pass exterior the adventure of the enemy. right here you desire to reason confusion, worry, and retreat.*** …***the fourth rule is: Make the enemy stay as much as their very own e book of regulations.*** …***the fourth rule consists of interior it the 5th rule: Ridicule is guy’s maximum powerful weapon.*** …***the 6th rule is: a sturdy tactic is one that your human beings delight in.*** …***the seventh rule is: A tactic that drags on too long turns right into a drag.*** …***the 8th rule: shop the stress on.*** …***the 9th rule: The risk is in many cases greater terrifying than the element itself.*** ***The 10th rule: the main premise for techniques is the form of operations which will guard a consistent stress upon the competition.*** …***The 11th rule is: in case you push a destructive confusing and deep adequate that is going to wreck by using into its counterside.*** …***The twelth rule: the fee of a useful attack is a useful option.*** …***The thirteenth rule: %. the objective, freeze it, customize it, and polarize it. — P.126-129*** .........it may be remembered which you will threaten the enemy and get away with it. you are able to insult and annoy him, however the only element it incredibly is unforgivable and that's absolute to get him to react is to chortle at him. This motives irrational anger. — P.134-one hundred thirty five........ ''''this could be a tactic that the liberals use and that they don`t additionally be conscious of it`s from Saul Alinsky !!

2016-11-08 20:35:38 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

The leftism concept has so infiltrated our education system that it's amazing anyone has coherent thought!!!

2007-07-09 10:44:22 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 3 3

I agree, he has my vote.

2007-07-09 10:42:24 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 2 0

fedest.com, questions and answers