Blue Peter ie The B.B.C. have been fined £50,000 for the phone in scam they were found guilty of.
THIS MONEY WILL BE PAID BY THE LICENCE PAYERS!
In other words you and I!
So if we are paying the fine then logically we are guilty of a criminal offence and now have a criminal record!
2007-07-09 08:39:56 · 25 answers · asked by stickadiddle 7 in Politics & Government ➔ Law & Ethics
It wasnt a fine handed down by court so it wasnt a crime.
2007-07-09 09:55:46 · answer #1 · answered by futuretopgun101 5 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Get a No Cost Background Check Scan at https://bitly.im/aNRTc
Its a sensible way to start. The site allows you to do a no cost scan simply to find out if any sort of data is in existence. A smaller analysis is done without cost. To get a detailed report its a modest payment.
You may not realize how many good reasons there are to try and find out more about the people around you. After all, whether you're talking about new friends, employees, doctors, caretakers for elderly family members, or even significant others, you, as a citizen, have a right to know whether the people you surround yourself with are who they say they are. This goes double in any situation that involves your children, which not only includes teachers and babysitters, but also scout masters, little league coaches and others. Bottom line, if you want to find out more about someone, you should perform a background check.
2016-05-19 22:03:37 · answer #2 · answered by ? 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
ah actualy to have a criminal record your a crime needs to be documented by your name and as this was not a criminal offence or a fine handed down from a criminal court. They were found guilty by the people who monitor television programs it is the equivlent of a boy scout being fined by his pack
2007-07-09 10:38:52 · answer #3 · answered by ? 5 · 1⤊ 1⤋
Not quite true. If a parent or spouse pays a fine, that doesn't make them guilty of the offence. See your point though.
2007-07-09 08:44:30 · answer #4 · answered by louloubelle 4 · 1⤊ 1⤋
You assume I haven't got a criminal record already!
2007-07-09 08:53:36 · answer #5 · answered by saylavee 3 · 1⤊ 0⤋
It does make you a bit pissed off. Maybe the individuals who commited the crime,rather than the corporation,should have been fined.Shoddy work by the prosecution there
2007-07-09 10:35:58 · answer #6 · answered by salforddude 5 · 0⤊ 1⤋
Don't talk to me about criminal records - I've warned my missus enough times about Take That
2007-07-09 09:05:09 · answer #7 · answered by Kes51 4 · 0⤊ 1⤋
£50k
The BBC could save this amount by not paying Jonathon Ross for ten minutes.
2007-07-09 09:46:39 · answer #8 · answered by Spartan L 5 · 1⤊ 0⤋
but as we pay for the BBC to exist does that make us accessorise before the act?
2007-07-09 10:37:47 · answer #9 · answered by dave c 3 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Wow, I'm a teacher will I get the sack?
2007-07-09 08:51:13 · answer #10 · answered by jen 5 · 1⤊ 0⤋